CEASE 1999.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Study design: factorial RCT Country: multicentre ‐ 36 clinic centres in 17 European countries Recruitment: community volunteers |
|
Participants | 3575 smokers (> 14 cigarettes per day) 52% men, average age 41, average cigarettes per day: 27 (34% had previously used NRT) | |
Interventions | Factorial design compared 2 patch doses and 2 treatment durations. Dose 15 mg or 25 mg (16‐hour), duration of active treatment 28 weeks (including 4‐week fading) or 12 weeks (including 4‐week fading) 1) 25 mg patch for 28 weeks 2) 25 mg patch for 12 weeks 3) 15 mg patch for 28 weeks 4) 15 mg patch for 12 weeks 5) Placebo | |
Outcomes | Prolonged abstinence at 12 months, sustained from week 2
Validation: expired CO < 10 ppm at each clinic visit Adverse events: SAEs measured during whole study period, but cardiac AEs reported within 8‐week treatment period |
|
Notes | Level of support reclassified to high for 2007, because of repeated visits. Limited support at these visits
This study was sponsored by Pharmacia and Upjohn Conflicts of interest: not reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "A computer‐generated allocation list was prepared centrally and allocated subjects to treatment numbers". Randomisation stratified by centre |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | See process above |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Active and placebo patches were identical in appearance and packaging. In order to maintain blinding, all subjects continued to use two patches for a total of 26 weeks"; i.e. non‐tapered groups were switched to placebo patches |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 22% lost to 12‐month follow‐up, and 54% withdrew |