Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 19;2023(6):CD013308. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013308.pub2

Hughes 1991.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: parallel RCT
Country: USA
Recruitment: primary care patients
Participants 106 smokers, motivation to quit not required
48% men, average age 38, average cigarettes per day 26
Interventions 1) Free prescription for nicotine gum for up to 6 months
2) Nicotine gum at cost of USD 6/box (96 pieces 2 mg)
3) Nicotine gum at USD 20/box
All participants received brief physician advice with 1 follow‐up
Outcomes Abstinence at 6 months
Validation: observer verification of all 6‐month quitters
Adverse events: not measured
Notes Tested effect of price on gum use and efficacy. We combined groups 2 and 3 to make 1 purchasing arm in meta‐analysis. Similar quit rates in the 2 combined arms
This study was supported by a grant (DA‐04066) and Research Scientist Development Award (DA‐00109) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Merrell‐Dow Research Institute provided nicotine gum.
Conflicts of interest: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Physician opened a sealed envelope" which assigned participants to a price group
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Double‐blind, as described above. But physicians knew how much each participant paid, and therefore which group they were in, so could have managed them differently (Quote: "no anecdotal evidence that this occurred")
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Losses at 6 months reported; all were counted as failures, but distribution across the groups not reported