Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 1;11(3):e11519. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11519

Table 1.

Taxon name, voucher number, and DNA concentration for the 13 samples collected and preserved in 96% ethanol. The DNA concentrations correspond to the DNA extracts prepared from each sample after three weeks, six weeks, and four years. Misplaced values are absent for the first two samples at the three‐week time point.

Sample taxon Voucher DNA concentration after 3 wk (ng/μL) DNA concentration after 6 wk (ng/μL) DNA concentration after 4 ya (ng/μL)
Causonis japonica (Thunb.) Raf. IB 2010‐082 NA 4.7 <0.01
Tetrastigma lawsonii Herb. Kew Wen 11680 NA 5.0 <0.01
Pterisanthes eriopoda (Miq.) Planch. Wen 11831 4.2 2.7 42.3
Tetrastigma rafflesiae Planch. Wen 11824 37.2 28.3 710.0
Ampelocissus ascendiflora Latiff Wen 11822 4.4 1.3 550.0
Cissus discolor Blume IB 2012‐011 4.9 0.9 301.0
Cyphostemma juttae (Dinter & Gilg) Desc. IB 2010‐093 4.8 2.8 407.0
Cyphostemma sandersonii (Harv.) Desc. IB 2010‐094 6.7 2.8 183.0
Cissus tuberosa Moc. & Sessé ex DC. IB 2010‐091 13.4 10.2 214.0
Vitis monticola Buckley Wen 12662 2.1 3.4 137.0
Vitis munsoniana J. H. Simpson ex Planch. Wen s.n. 4.1 11.0 174.0
Parthenocissus heptaphylla (Planch.) Britton Wen 12657 4.2 7.7 71.8
Nekemias arborea (L.) J. Wen & Boggan Wen 12694 9.0 16.0 291.0
a

After four years of storage, the DNA was extracted using proteinase K in the lysis buffer and a doubled amount of input tissue was processed.