Table 2.
The linear association between BUN and the probability of DR in different models.
| Variable | Crude model | Minimally adjusted model | Fully adjusted model |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUN | 1.18 (1.10, 1.26) < 0.001 | 1.18 (1.09, 1.27) < 0.001 | 1.11 (1.03, 1.21) 0.011 |
| BUN (Quartile) | |||
| Q1 | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Q2 | 1.67 (0.93, 3.00) 0.087 | 1.70 (0.91, 3.15) 0.094 | 1.82 (0.95, 3.48) 0.070 |
| Q3 | 1.56 (0.88, 2.79) 0.131 | 1.58 (0.85, 2.94) 0.150 | 1.64 (0.84, 3.18) 0.144 |
| Q4 | 3.27 (1.85, 5.77) < 0.001 | 3.35 (1.75, 6.42) 0.001 | 2.14 (1.06, 4.31) 0.033 |
| P for trend | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.053 |
The models were presented as OR (95%CI) P-value.
Crude model: we did not adjust other covariants.
Minimally adjusted model: we adjusted age, sex and DM duration.
Fully adjusted model: we adjusted age, sex, DM duration, D-dimer, LDL, HbA1c, serum albumin, HBP, SBP.