Table 3.
Viewer | Advantages | Disadvantages | Language | Operating system | WSI support |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QuPath |
|
|
Java | macOS, Windows, Linux | Yes |
ImageJ/Fiji |
|
|
Java | macOS, Windows, Linux | Plugin required |
Orbit |
|
|
Java | macOS, Windows, Linux | Yes |
napari |
|
|
Python | macOS, Windows, Linux | Plugin required |
BioImageXD | Many native functions for common image processing steps implemented from well validated frameworks |
|
Python, C++ | macOS, Windows, Linux | Yes |
Cytomine |
|
|
Java | Web based | Yes |
Icy |
|
|
Java | MacOS, Windows, Linux | Yes |
Cellprofiler |
|
|
Python | macOS, Windows | No |
This list is not exhaustive but provides an overview about the different arguments a research department might consider when choosing a software for building image analysis workflows. Different requirements have different solutions, where each of the viewer software solutions was built with different intentions.
WSI, whole slide image.