Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 6;13:1172606. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1172606

Table 2.

Results of the association analysis between ABO blood group, PDAC susceptibility loci analysed individually and combined in a PGS, and the risk of IPMN progression.

Number of subjects
(progressed/non-progressed)
No WFs at diagnosis All IPMNs
298 (91/207) - 354 (234/120) -
Blood group HR (95% CI) p HR (95% CI) p
Non-O blood group vs. O group 0.89 (0.59–1.35) 0.581 0.97 (0.67–1.39) 0.857
A blood group vs. O group 0.93 (0.60–1.45) 0.761 0.97 (0.66–1.43) 0.896
AB blood group vs. O group 1.24 (0.49–3.15) 0.646 1.22 (0.52–2.85) 0.642
B groups vs. O group 0.54 (0.21–1.37) 0.193 0.80 (0.38–1.68) 0.556
Genetic variant RA EA HR (95% CI) p HR (95% CI) p
rs7046076 t c 0.89 (0.64–1.26) 0.515 0.96 (0.71–1.29) 0.781
rs2035875 g a 1.07 (0.77–1.47) 0.694 1.11 (0.83–1.47) 0.479
rs13303010 a g 1.1 (0.73–1.67) 0.639 1.12 (0.77–1.61) 0.555
rs2736100 a c 0.94 (0.70–1.26) 0.689 0.97 (0.75–1.25) 0.821
rs351365 c t 0.87 (0.60–1.26) 0.459 0.85 (0.62–1.18) 0.345
rs2816938 a t 0.86 (0.61–1.21) 0.388 0.82 (0.60–1.10) 0.185
rs3790844 a g 0.97 (0.66–1.45) 0.901 0.98 (0.68–1.40) 0.899
rs1486134 t g 0.77 (0.54–1.10) 0.152 0.75 (0.54–1.04) 0.082
rs9854771 g a 0.84 (0.61–1.16) 0.292 0.92 (0.71–1.20) 0.561
rs2853677 a g 0.99 (0.74–1.34) 0.964 1.05 (0.82–1.36) 0.681
rs2736098 t c 0.92 (0.66–1.29) 0.641 0.96 (0.72–1.29) 0.79
rs35226131 c t 0.63 (0.31–1.28) 0.200 0.72 (0.44–1.20) 0.214
rs401681 c t 1.10 (0.81–1.49) 0.561 1.11 (0.86–1.44) 0.422
rs17688601 c a 0.94 (0.69–1.28) 0.697 0.94 (0.72–1.23) 0.671
rs73328514 a t 0.95 (0.59–1.53) 0.840 1.03 (0.67–1.56) 0.905
rs6971499 t c 0.95 (0.57–1.58) 0.851 0.95 (0.61–1.48) 0.835
rs172310 c a 1.15 (0.85–1.57) 0.369 1.19 (0.92–1.55) 0.189
rs2941471 a g 0.98 (0.72–1.34) 0.914 0.92 (0.70–1.21) 0.548
rs10094872 t a 1.30 (0.92–1.85) 0.141 1.39 (1.02–1.89) 0.035
rs1561927 t c 0.89 (0.62–1.29) 0.543 1.03 (0.75–1.42) 0.846
rs10991043 t c 0.98 (0.72–1.33) 0.874 1.05 (0.80–1.37) 0.739
rs7310409 g a 0.94 (0.69–1.29) 0.716 1.02 (0.78–1.33) 0.895
rs9581943 g a 1.04 (0.79–1.36) 0.794 0.97 (0.77–1.24) 0.829
rs9543325 t c 1.19 (0.86–1.64) 0.298 1.13 (0.86–1.49) 0.382
rs8028529 t c 0.87 (0.56–1.35) 0.523 0.84 (0.57–1.24) 0.385
rs7190458 g a 0.53 (0.21–1.33) 0.175 0.69 (0.34–1.40) 0.305
rs4795218 g a 0.91 (0.63–1.32) 0.624 1.05 (0.76–1.44) 0.779
rs11655237 c t 0.82 (0.50–1.35) 0.435 0.88 (0.58–1.33) 0.539
rs1517037 c t 1.54 (1.05–2.25) 0.027 1.23 (0.89–1.70) 0.209
rs16986825 c t 0.81 (0.54–1.21) 0.299 1.04 (0.75–1.42) 0.829
rs8176746 c a 0.69 (0.36–1.34) 0.272 0.88 (0.50–1.54) 0.652
rs505922 t c 0.98 (0.71–1.34) 0.882 0.98 (0.74–1.28) 0.856
PGS
2nd vs. 1st quintile 1.25 (0.67–2.31) 0.480 1.29 (0.74–2.23) 0.366
3rd vs. 1st quintile 1.50 (0.79–2.85) 0.219 1.38 (0.78–2.44) 0.271
4th vs. 1st quintile 1.04 (0.56–1.94) 0.902 1.01 (0.56–1.82) 0.977
5th vs. 1st quintile 0.90 (0.41–2.00) 0.802 1.18 (0.66–2.09) 0.579

All the analyses were adjusted by sex and age.

PGS, polygenic risk score; RA, reference allele; EA, effect allele; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PGS, polygenic score; IPMN, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; WFs, worrisome features.