Skip to main content
. 2000 Apr 15;28(8):1838–1847. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.8.1838

Table 1. Evaluation of the dataset.

Method True (%) False positive (%)
Dodd and Egan 65.0 15.0
Gibbs 50.7 30.0
PROSITE 67.9  9.3
Blattner annotations 97.6 21.0

We used the dataset of 159 experimentally supported proteins to evaluate the performance of the methods. The evaluations of the Dodd and Egan and Gibbs methods were done by comparing with the set of 128 proteins that have a reported HTH motif.