Skip to main content
. 2023 May 1;27(3):295–300. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_312_22

Table 1.

Effect of studied treatment modality on the mean values of pocket depth, clinical attachment level and radiographic three dimensional volume measurements (n=20)

Pre Post t P
CAL
 Mean±SD 6.5±1 3.6±1 19.262* <0.001*
 Median (minimum-maximum) 6.7 (4.7-8.3) 3.3 (2.3-6.3)
PPD
 Mean±SD 6.3±0.8 3.1±0.7 21.327* <0.001*
 Median (minimum-maximum) 6.5 (5-7.7) 3 (2.3-4.7)
3D volume of facial bone defects
 Mean±SD 75.2±20 36.8±11.7 12.813* <0.001*
 Median (minimum-maximum) 72.2 (42.4-109.2) 35 (20.2-60.2)
3D volume of interproximal defects
 Mean±SD 84.8±29 37.7±18.2 13.403* <0.001*
 Median (minimum-maximum) 80 (49.9-150) 37.6 (15.6-82.5)

*Statistically significant at P≤0.05. P - P value for comparing between pre and post; t - Paired t-test; PD - Pocket depth; PPD - Probing pocket depth; CAL - Clinical attachment level; SD - Standard deviation; 3D - Three dimensional