Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fam Relat. 2022 Feb 7;72(3):719–733. doi: 10.1111/fare.12652

TABLE 4.

Tests of Measurement Invariance of the PPSM across Gender Groups

Model χ2 (df) CFI/TLI RMSEA SRMR p valuea
Eight-item PPSM
 Configural invariance 69.11* (40) .97/.96 .07 .03
 Weak factorial invariance 85.30* (47) .96/.96 .07 .06 .01
 Strong factorial invariance 97.53* (54) .96/.96 .07 .05
 Strict factorial invariance 106.65* (62) .96/.96 .07 .06
Four-item PPSM
 Configural invariance 11.16* (4) .98/.95 .11 .02
 Weak factorial invariance 15.06* (7) .98/.96 .09 .04 .30
 Strong factorial invariance 20.04* (10) .98/.97 .08 .04 .22
 Strict factorial invariance 27.20* (14) .97/.97 .08 .05 .12

Note. CFI = comparative fit index; PPSM = Pediatric Psychological Stress Measure; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR: standardized root mean square residual; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index.

a

χ2 test.

*

p < .05;

male, n = 133; female, n = 150.