Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 5;4(3):80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.03.002

Table 3.

Validation of the PMcardio app for the primary and key secondary outcomes in the overall sample (n = 290)

Major ECG abnormalities
Ref + Ref - Sensitivity Specificity LR+ LR- PPV NPV Kappa
PMcardio + 61 18 85.9% (75.6–93.0) 91.7% (87.3–95.0) 10.4 (6.6–16.4) 0.15 (0.09–0.27) 77.2% (68.3–84.2) 95.2% (91.8–97.3) 0.95 (0.91–0.99)
- 10 200
Atrial fibrillation or flutter
Ref + Ref - Sensitivity Specificity LR+ LR- PPV NPV Kappa
PMcardio + 34 2 97.1% (85.1–99.9) 99.2% (97.2–99.9) 123.4 (31.0–491.2) 0.03 (0.00–0.20) 94.4% (81.0–98.5) 99.6% (97.3–99.9) 1.00 (1.00–1.00)
- 1 252
Indication of (past) ischemia
Ref + Ref - Sensitivity Specificity LR+ LR- PPV NPV Kappa
PMcardio + 14 10 53.6% (33.4–73.4) 96.2% (93.1–98.2) 14.2 (7.0–28.6) 0.48 (0.32–0.73) 58.3% (40.9–73.9) 95.5% (93.3–97.0) 0.91 (0.81–1.00)
- 12 253
Clinically relevant impulse or conduction abnormality
Ref + Ref - Sensitivity Specificity LR+ LR- PPV NPV Kappa
PMcardio + 24 20 88.9% (70.8–97.7) 92.4% (88.5–95.3) 11.6 (7.5–18.1) 0.12 (0.04–0.35) 54.6% (43.6–65.1) 98.8% (96.5–99.6) 0.91 (0.84–0.98)
- 3 242

Data are point estimate (95% confidence interval). Reference in each analysis is expert panel consensus on presence of the outcome of interest.

ECG = electrocardiogram; LR+ = positive likelihood ratio; LR- = negative likelihood ratio; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value.

Kappa for interobserver agreement between Android and iPhone.