Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 26;17(5):960–969. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000712

Table 2.

Pearson's correlations of key study variables (n 1275)

n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PFSQ constructs (assessed in 2009)
1. Instrumental Feeding 1275
2. Emotional Feeding 1275 0·64***
3. Encouragement 1275 0·04 −0·03
4. Overt Control 1275 −0·26*** −0·39*** 0·28***
5. Covert Control 1275 0·11*** 0·01 0·24*** 0·09**
Parenting style dimensions (assessed in 2008)
6. Support 1274 −0·11*** −0·10*** 0·17*** 0·14*** −0·01
7. Behavioural Control 1274 −0·04 −0·03 0·05 0·05 0·02 0·33***
8. Psychological Control 1274 0·28*** 0·25*** −0·16*** −0·17*** 0·00 −0·14*** 0·01
Dependent variables in 2010
9. Child fruit intake 1272 −0·06* −0·03 0·07* −0·02 0·15*** 0·04 0·08** −0·03
10. Child energy-dense snacking 1265 0·11*** 0·14*** −0·11*** −0·16*** −0·17*** −0·02 0·02 0·02 0·01
11. Child SSB intake 1267 −0·01 −0·01 −0·06* −0·07* −0·14*** −0·03 −0·06* −0·02 −0·05 0·21***
12. Child BMI Z-score† 1184 0·06 0·03 −0·04 −0·02 0·13*** −0·02 −0·04 0·10*** 0·01 −0·10*** −0·06*

PFSQ, Parental Feeding Style Questionnaire; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage.

Correlation is significant at the: *0·05 level (two-tailed), **0·01 level (two-tailed), ***0·001 level (two-tailed).

†Underweight children excluded.