Table 3.
Correlation of weekly frequency of breakfast consumption with each of construct of Pender's Health Promotion Model before and after the intervention according study group: female students (n 100) attending two middle schools in average-income areas of Qom, Iran, April–June 2011
Experimental group | Control group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |
Perceived benefits | <0·001*** | <0·001*** | <0·01** | <0·05* |
Perceived barriers | <0·001*** | <0·001*** | <0·001*** | <0·001*** |
Perceived self-efficacy | <0·001*** | <0·001*** | <0·001*** | <0·001*** |
Activity-related affect (positive) | <0·001*** | <0·001*** | <0·01** | <0·01** |
Activity-related affect (negative) | <0·05* | <0·05* | <0·01** | <0·001*** |
Interpersonal influences | <0·05* | <0·01** | <0·05* | <0·05* |
Situational influences | <0·05* | <0·01** | <0·05* | <0·05* |
Competing demands and preferences | <0·001*** | <0·001*** | <0·001*** | <0·001*** |
Commitment to plan of action | <0·001*** | <0·001*** | <0·001*** | <0·05* |
Correlation was significant: *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001