Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 5;17(12):2806–2815. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014000044

Table 4.

Predicting change in non-adherence scores in the Whole Foods group; Comparing Healthy Options in Cooking and Eating (CHOICE) Study. Longitudinal regression model in which non-adherence is a time-varying dependent variable

Predictor Estimate df t Significance
Intercept −26·038 11·386 −1·065 0·309
(Time = 1) 1·575 46·605 0·387 0·701
(Time = 2) 0·867 38·988 0·779 0·441
(Time = 3) 0§§
Age* −0·084 11·366 −0·363 0·724
Race† 4·418 11·591 1·871 0·087
Ethnicity‡ −1·162 11·376 −0·439 0·669
Marital status§ −1·179 11·305 −0·606 0·557
Weight∥ 0·063 11·347 1·680 0·120
Education¶ −0·884 11·749 −0·925 0·374
Class attendance** −2·977 47·118 −0·635 0·529
Positive attitude†† 8·995 11·465 1·646 0·127
Negative attitude‡‡ 1·843 11·313 1·013 0·332

*Age of participant.

†Race of participant (white v. other).

‡Ethnicity of participant (non-Hispanic v. other).

§Marital status of participant (married v. other).

∥Weight of participant over course of intervention.

¶Education of participant (high-school graduate; some college, vocational or business school; college graduate; advanced degree).

**Attendance at class sessions.

††‘Positive’ attitudes towards cooking and eating measured at baseline.

‡‡‘Negative’ attitudes towards cooking and eating measured at baseline.

§§This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.