Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 11;17(4):877–883. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000530

Table 2.

Items in order of location (loc)

Item Scale Cluster Loc Res df χ 2 df P (χ 2) Thresholds
18. Engagement Concern −1·66 2·5 398·3 13·1 7 0·070
15. Engagement Concern −1·23 −0·7 400·9 6·7 7 0·464
17. Engagement Concern −0·27 0·9 400·9 7·5 7 0·379
13. Engagement Concern −0·01 1·7 402·6 5·3 7 0·627
16. Engagement Democracy 0·20 −1·1 400·0 12·7 7 0·079
14. Engagement Democracy 0·83 −3·6 400·0 2·8 7 0·902
12. Engagement Democracy 0·87 0·7 399·2 4·6 7 0·706
19. Engagement Democracy 1·28 1·1 393·1 2·9 7 0·898
24. Claims Evaluating −0·61 0·3 412·8 23·6 7 0·001 Disordered
21. Claims Evaluating −0·50 −0·6 411·9 7·7 7 0·359 Disordered
20. Claims Evaluating −0·46 −0·1 411·0 4·0 7 0·774 Disordered
25. Claims Evaluating −0·06 4·5* 408·3 30·9 7 0·000* Disordered
29. Claims Evaluating 0·03 0·8 406·5 10·2 7 0·176
23. Claims Identifying 0·12 1·0 391·2 14·2 7 0·047 Disordered
22. Claims Identifying 0·12 0·0 406·5 6·5 7 0·477 Disordered
26. Claims Evaluating† 0·25 −1·3 412·8 15·1 7 0·034 Disordered
27. Claims Identifying 0·31 0·6 404·7 4·0 7 0·781
28. Claims Identifying 0·39 1·0 393·9 2·6 7 0·919
30. Claims Identifying 0·40 1·6 404·7 8·1 7 0·326 Disordered

Table 2 refers to scale (‘engagement in dietary habits’ (engagement) and ‘taking a critical stance towards nutrition claims and their sources’ (claims)), cluster (‘concern about dietary habits’ (concern), ‘willingness to engage in democratic processes to improve dietary habits’ (democracy), ‘justifying premises for and evaluating the sender of nutrition claims’ (evaluating) and ‘identifying scientific nutrition claims’ (identifying)), loc (item location), res (fit residual), df (degrees of freedom), chi-square (χ 2), chi-square probability (P (χ 2)) and ordering of thresholds.

*Item 25 under-discriminates.

†Item 26 overlaps with the identifying items.