Table 1.
Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample: adult members (n 276) in ten communities on the Navajo Nation, May–November 2007
Food secure | Food insecurity at household level | Food insecurity at adult level | Food insecurity at child level | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | Comparisons significant | ||||||||||||||||||
Sociodemographic characteristic | Mean | sd | Mean | sd | Mean | sd | Mean | sd | P value | for ANOVA | ||||||||||||
% | 23·2 | 22·1 | 25·7 | 28·9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sex (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Male | 23·4 | 21·3 | 22·5 | 22·5 | NS | |||||||||||||||||
Female | 76·6 | 78·7 | 77·5 | 77·5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Age (years) (n 274) | 42·8 | 14·1 | 45·4 | 17·2 | 46·4 | 18·7 | 50·6 | 17·2 | 0·0476 | NS | ||||||||||||
Household size | 4·4 | 2·1 | 4·3 | 2·9 | 3·8 | 1·9 | 4·1 | 1·9 | NS | NS | ||||||||||||
Years of schooling (n 275) | 12·3 | 2·5 | 12·0 | 2·8 | 11·7 | 3·6 | 9·9 | 4·4 | 0·0001 | 1 v. 4, 2 v. 4 | ||||||||||||
High education, >12 years of schooling (%) | 42·19 | 23·33 | 39·44 | 13·75 | 0·0003 | |||||||||||||||||
Full-time employed (%) | 54·69 | 37·70 | 38·03 | 27·50 | 0·01 | |||||||||||||||||
Material style of life score | 13·2 | 7·8 | 12·2 | 5·4 | 10·5 | 6·0 | 8·7 | 5·6 | 0·0001 | 1 v. 4, 2 v. 4 | ||||||||||||
Marriage (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Never married | 23·4 | 26·2 | 26·8 | 20·0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Married | 43·8 | 24·6 | 32·4 | 35·0 | 0·15 | |||||||||||||||||
Separated | 3·1 | 11·5 | 2·8 | 6·3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Divorced | 7·8 | 8·2 | 9·9 | 13·8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Widowed | 6·3 | 13·1 | 11·3 | 13·8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common law | 10·9 | 16·4 | 16·9 | 11·3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Food assistance programmes (%) (n 273) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WIC | 20·6 | 24·6 | 19·7 | 26·9 | NS | |||||||||||||||||
Food stamps | 22·2 | 31·2 | 18·3 | 33·3 | NS | |||||||||||||||||
Commodity foods | 17·5 | 9·8 | 23·9 | 20·5 | NS | |||||||||||||||||
Eat at senior centre | 11·1 | 21·3 | 25·4 | 23·1 | NS | |||||||||||||||||
Food Bank/Navajo Way | 6·4 | 8·2 | 16·9 | 3·9 | 0·03 |
WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.
The χ 2 test was used for dichotomous and categorical variables. P < 0·05 was the level of significance for χ 2.
ANOVA was used for continuous variables. P = 0·008 was the level of significance for ANOVA.