Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 24;17(11):2425–2435. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014000688

Table 6.

Odds ratios (95 % confidence intervals) per 10-point increase in adherence to the SFP score for obesity risk defined as BMI and WC, after conducting sensitivity analyses, among 6717 participants aged 35–69 years, EPIC-Granada study

BMI WC BMI WC
Sensitivity analysis OR* 95 % CI P value OR* 95 % CI P value OR 95 % CI P value OR 95 % CI P value
SFP score (models for reference)
All 0·94 0·91, 0·98 0·002 0·91 0·88, 0·95 <0·001 1·04 0·99, 1·10 0·110 0·88 0·84, 0·93 <0·001
Men 0·86 0·79, 0·94 0·001 0·86 0·80, 0·94 0·001 0·91 0·81, 1·03 0·141 0·86 0·76, 0·96 0·010
Women 0·96 0·92, 1·01 0·104 0·92 0·87, 0·97 <0·001 1·08 1·00, 1·15 0·046 0·90 0·84, 0·95 <0·001
Excluding participants with self-reported status of hyperlipidaemia and hypertension
All 0·93 0·88, 0·97 0·002 0·91 0·87, 0·95 <0·001 1·03 0·96, 1·10 0·415 0·89 0·83, 0·95 <0·001
Men 0·87 0·78, 0·97 0·014 0·89 0·80, 0·98 0·031 0·89 0·76, 1·04 0·134 0·89 0·76, 1·00 0·046
Women 0·94 0·89, 1·00 0·064 0·91 0·87, 0·96 0·001 1·06 0·99, 1·14 0·107 0·89 0·83, 0·96 0·002
Excluding under- and over-reporters of energy intake
All 0·92 0·87, 0·96 <0·001 0·91 0·87, 0·95 <0·001 1·01 0·95, 1·07 0·742 0·89 0·84, 0·95 <0·001
Men 0·87 0·79, 0·96 0·007 0·89 0·81, 0·98 0·019 0·96 0·84, 1·09 0·557 0·89 0·77, 1·00 0·046
Women 0·93 0·88, 0·97 0·004 0·91 0·87, 0·96 <0·001 1·02 0·96, 1·09 0·491 0·89 0·83, 0·96 0·002
Without energy-standardized intakes§
All 0·95 0·91, 0·98 0·008 0·93 0·89, 0·97 0·001 1·02 0·96, 1·08 0·544 0·91 0·86, 0·96 0·001
Men 0·88 0·82, 0·96 0·003 0·89 0·83, 0·98 0·011 0·91 0·81, 1·02 0·093 0·90 0·81, 0·99 0·021
Women 0·97 0·92, 1·01 0·169 0·94 0·89, 0·98 0·009 1·06 0·99, 1·13 0·072 0·91 0·85, 0·97 0·004

SFP, Spanish Food Pyramid; WC, waist circumference; EPIC, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.

*

Adjusted for smoking status (never, former, current smoker), educational level (none, primary, secondary, professional school and university degree, missing), misreporting of energy intake (under-reporters, acceptable reporters and over-reporters) and sex (in models combining men and women).

Further adjusted for BMI (kg/m2) or WC (cm).

Without adjustment for misreporting of energy intake.

§

SPF score without energy standardization (8368 kJ (2000 kcal)).