Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 18;17(8):1776–1785. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002127

Table 4.

Multilevel linear model for fruit consumption with interaction between rurality and deprivation (REML estimates*; se) among 15-year-old adolescents; data from the 2010 Scotland Health Behaviour in School-aged Children survey

Fruit consumption
Mean se
Fixed effects
Constant/intercept 5·52 2·32
Age −0·09 0·15
Sex (ref.: Male)
Female 0·42 0·09‡
FAS (ref.: Low FAS)
Medium FAS 0·11 0·12
High FAS 0·22 0·12
Deprivation (SIMD score/10) −0·17 0·05‡
School type (ref.: State school)
Independent school 0·97 0·29‡
Rurality (ref.: Four Cities)
Other Urban −0·11 0·24
Accessible Towns −0·30 0·31
Remote Towns −0·49 0·35
Accessible Rural 0·70 0·32‡
Remote Rural 0·70 0·33‡
Rurality × Deprivation interaction (ref.: Four Cities × SIMD score/10)
Other Urban × SIMD score/10 −0·04 0·09
Accessible Towns × SIMD score/10 −0·06 0·15
Remote Towns × SIMD score/10 0·21 0·15
Accessible Rural × SIMD score/10 −0·44 0·19‡
Remote Rural × SIMD score/10 −0·34 0·17‡
Random effects
Level 1 (child) variance 5·638 0·159
Level 2 (school) variance 0·162 0·057
Level 3 (education authority) variance 0·000 0·000
−2 log likelihood 12 189·8
No. of parameters 20
AIC† 12 229·8

REML, restricted maximum likelihood; ref., referent category; FAS, Family Affluence Scale; SIMD, 2006 Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation.

*Via restricted iterative generalised least squares (RIGLS).

†AIC is the Akaike Information Criterion; the larger this is, the worse the model fit.

‡95 % CI is above or below 0.