Table 3.
Adjusted multinomial analysis of FVFVM consumption according to hierarchical model (n 2860). Pelotas, Brazil, 2012
| Quartile 2 (1 FVFVM) | Quartile 3 (2–3 FVFVM) | Quartile 4 (≥4 FVFVM) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | PR | 95 % CI | P value | PR | 95 % CI | P value | PR | 95 % CI | P value |
| Level 1 | |||||||||
| Sex | 0·17* | 0·11* | <0·001* | ||||||
| Male | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | |||
| Female | 1·15 | 0·94, 1·40 | 1·16 | 0·96, 1·40 | 1·63 | 1·30, 2·03 | |||
| Skin colour | 0·27* | 0·22* | 0·03* | ||||||
| White | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | |||
| Black | 1·42 | 0·98, 2·04 | 1·46 | 1·00, 2·12 | 1·84 | 1·18, 2·87 | |||
| Mestizo | 0·95 | 0·62, 1·46 | 1·27 | 0·84, 1·93 | 1·30 | 0·79, 2·16 | |||
| Others | 1·23 | 0·51, 2·95 | 0·93 | 0·30, 2·90 | 2·13 | 0·80, 5·65 | |||
| Age (complete years) | <0·001† | <0·001† | <0·001† | ||||||
| 20–29 | 3·00 | 2·07, 4·36 | 9·05 | 5·76, 14·20 | 16·86 | 9·70, 29·30 | |||
| 30–39 | 2·19 | 1·56, 3·07 | 4·99 | 3·44, 7·24 | 8·49 | 5·13, 14·05 | |||
| 40–49 | 1·53 | 1·09, 2·14 | 3·30 | 2·33, 4·68 | 4·78 | 2·87, 7·98 | |||
| 50–59 | 1·43 | 1·09, 1·88 | 1·46 | 1·03, 2·06 | 1·24 | 0·70, 2·19 | |||
| ≥60 | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | |||
| Marital status | 0·02* | <0·001* | 0·12* | ||||||
| Married/with partner | 0·85 | 0·54, 1·32 | 0·73 | 0·47, 1·14 | 0·82 | 0·41, 1·61 | |||
| Single/without partner | 0·65 | 0·38, 1·12 | 0·57 | 0·34, 0·95 | 0·60 | 0·30, 1·21 | |||
| Separated | 1·48 | 0·87, 2·51 | 1·58 | 0·91, 2·73 | 1·18 | 0·50, 2·82 | |||
| Widowed | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | |||
| Schooling (complete years) | 0·13* | 0·29* | 0·05* | ||||||
| 0–4 | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | |||
| 5–8 | 0·89 | 0·66, 1·20 | 1·17 | 0·85, 1·62 | 1·60 | 1·00, 2·55 | |||
| 9–11 | 1·25 | 0·87, 1·78 | 1·31 | 0·92, 1·87 | 2·04 | 1·23, 3·37 | |||
| ≥12 | 1·00 | 0·67, 1·48 | 0·97 | 0·64, 1·47 | 1·98 | 1·11, 3·53 | |||
| Family income (tertile) | 0·05* | 0·05† | 0·22* | ||||||
| Lower | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | |||
| Middle | 1·25 | 0·94, 1·66 | 1·15 | 0·85, 1·55 | 1·09 | 0·73, 1·62 | |||
| Higher | 1·50 | 1·08, 2·09 | 1·62 | 1·15, 2·27 | 1·41 | 0·93, 2·14 | |||
| Level 2 | |||||||||
| Self-rated health | 0·02† | <0·01† | 0·19* | ||||||
| Excellent | 1·61 | 0·93, 2·79 | 2·01 | 1·10, 3·64 | 1·81 | 0·75, 4·38 | |||
| Very good | 1·02 | 0·60, 1·74 | 1·09 | 0·60, 1·97 | 1·24 | 0·56, 2·78 | |||
| Good | 1·05 | 0·67, 1·65 | 1·08 | 0·67, 1·74 | 1·07 | 0·51, 2·21 | |||
| Regular | 0·83 | 0·52, 1·33 | 0·90 | 0·53, 1·52 | 1·15 | 0·57, 2·29 | |||
| Bad | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | 1·00 | – | |||
FVFVM, foods with voluntary fortification of vitamins and minerals; PR, prevalence ratio.
The first quartile (0 FVFVM) is the base outcome and was omitted.
*Wald test for heterogeneity.
†Wald test for linear trend.