Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 31;17(4):756–763. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002929

Table 2.

Vitamin D intakes (total, dietary and supplemental) of US adults aged ≥19 years by income, gender and race/ethnicity, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007–2010*,,,§,||

Total population Hispanic (x) NH White (y) NH Black (z)
μg/d se n μg/d se n μg/d se n μg/d se n Difference by row
Total intake by income
All 8·6 0·3 9719 8·1 0·3 2735 10·6 0·4 5005 7·1 0·3 1979 x<y, x>z, y>z
Low (a) 8·0 0·3 3128 7·6 0·5 1195 9·4 0·5 1320 6·9 0·4 613 y>z
Medium (b) 7·9 0·3 1326 8·2 0·5 430 9·7 0·7 561 5·8 0·4 335 x>z, y>z
High (c) 10·0 0·3 5265 8·7 0·3 1110 12·7 0·4 3124 8·5 0·5 1031 x<y, y>z
Difference by column a<c, b<c a<c, b<c b<c
Dietary intake by income
All 4·4 0·1 9719 4·7 0·2 2735 4·8 0·1 5005 3·5 0·1 1979 x>z, y>z
Low (a) 4·3 0·1 3128 4·4 0·2 1195 4·9 0·3 1320 3·7 0·2 613 y>z
Medium (b) 4·2 0·1 1326 4·9 0·3 430 4·5 0·3 561 3·0 0·2 335 x>z, y>z
High (c) 4·6 0·1 5265 4·8 0·2 1110 5·1 0·1 3124 4·0 0·2 1031 y>z
Difference by column b<c b<c
Supplemental intake by income
All 4·3 0·3 9719 3·4 0·3 2736 5·8 0·3 5005 3·6 0·3 1979 x<y, y>z
Low (a) 3·7 0·2 3128 3·2 0·4 1196 4·5 0·4 1320 3·3 0·4 613
Medium (b) 3·8 0·3 1326 3·3 0·5 430 5·2 0·6 561 2·8 0·4 335
High (c) 5·4 0·3 5265 3·9 0·3 1110 7·7 0·4 3124 4·5 0·4 1031 x<y, y>z
Difference by column a<c, b<c a<c, b<c b<c
Total intake by gender
Male (a) 8·1 0·2 4840 8·1 0·4 1340 9·8 0·5 2526 6·6 0·4 974 x<y, y>z
Female (b) 9·1 0·3 4879 7·7 0·3 1395 11·8 0·6 2479 7·6 0·4 1005 x<y, y>z
Difference by column a<b
Dietary intake by gender
Male (a) 4·9 0·1 4840 5·1 0·2 1340 5·6 0·2 2526 3·9 0·2 974 x>z, y>z
Female (b) 3·8 0·1 4879 4·1 0·2 1395 4·0 0·1 2479 3·2 0·2 1005 y>z
Difference by column a>b a>b a>b
Supplemental intake by gender
Male (a) 3·3 0·2 4840 3·0 0·3 1340 4·1 0·4 2526 2·7 0·3 974 y>z
Female (b) 5·3 0·2 4879 3·6 0·3 1395 7·8 0·5 2479 4·4 0·3 1005 x<y, y>z
Difference by column a<b a<b a<b

NH, Non-Hispanic.

*

Values are means with their standard errors.

Income categorized by poverty income ratio (PIR), with ≤131 % of PIR = low income, >131 % to ≤185 % of PIR = medium income and >185 % of PIR = high income.

Multiple comparisons by PIR were adjusted for age and gender. Tukey–Kramer adjustment was used for control for the family-wise error.

§

Multiple comparisons by gender were adjusted for age and PIR. Tukey–Kramer adjustment was used for control for the family-wise error.

||

Significant differences by row or column groups indicated by letter: P < 0·05.