Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 12;12:25–34. doi: 10.14283/jarlife.2023.7

Table 6.

Mixed-effect linear regression analysis for change from baseline in plasma p-tau181 according to intervention groups and plasma p-tau181 status among non-demented, community-dwelling older adults

Estimated mean within-group change from baseline 1 (95% CI); P-value Between-group difference over time (95% CI); P-value Difference in betweengroup differences over time for high vs. low p-tau
Nutritional blend Placebo Nutritional blend vs. placebo
Low p-tau2 High p-tau3 Low p-tau2 High p-tau3 Low p-tau2 High p-tau3
Plasma p-tau181 (pg/ mL) (n=289) 0.77 (-0.41, 1.95); 0.202 3.22 (1.43, 5.02); 0.001 0.77 (-0.37, 1.92); 0.184 2.42 (0.63, 4.21); 0.008 0.00 (-1.48, 1.47); 0.995 0.81 (-1.27, 2.88); 0.446 0.81 (-1.74, 3.36); 0.532
Plasma GFAP (pg/ mL) (n=283) 12.57 (0.41, 24.74); 0.043 18.62 (1.38, 35.86); 0.034 11.68 (-0.28, 23.63); 0.056 30.21 (13.01, 47.42); 0.001 0.90 (-15.99, 17.78); 0.917 -11.59 (-35.58, 12.39); 0.342 -12.49 (-41.69, 16.72); 0.401

GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; p-tau181, phosphorylated tau at threonine 181; 1Estimated with the mean at baseline; 2Defined as the two first tertiles (<15.1 pg/mL); 3Defined as the third tertile (≥15.1 pg/mL).