Table 2.

Odds of strong competitive beverage laws by level of state disfavoured soda sales tax

	Unadjusted model				Adjusted model*
	OR	se	P value	95 % CI	OR	se	P value	95 % CI
All grades
Disfavoured soda sales tax (0–7·5 %)	1·52	0·17	<0·0001	1·22, 1·90	1·53	0·18	<0·0001	1·22, 1·92
Disfavoured soda sales tax tertiles
0 %		Referent					Referent
>0–5 %	1·44	0·46	0·252	0·77, 2·70	1·69	0·56	0·111	0·89, 3·22
>5 %	2·33	0·53	<0·0001	1·49, 3·64	2·32	0·54	<0·0001	1·47, 3·65
Elementary school level
Disfavoured soda sales tax (0–7·5 %)	1·40	0·16	0·003	1·12, 1·76	1·41	0·16	0·003	1·12, 1·77
Disfavoured soda tax tertiles
0 %		Referent					Referent
>0–5 %	1·16	0·37	0·638	0·63, 2·15	1·35	0·44	0·352	0·72, 2·56
>5 %	2·01	0·46	0·002	1·28, 3·15	1·99	0·47	0·003	1·26, 3·15
Middle school level
Disfavoured soda sales tax (0–7·5 %)	1·43	0·16	0·001	1·15, 1·79	1·45	0·17	0·001	1·16, 1·81
Disfavoured soda tax tertiles
0 %		Referent					Referent
>0–5 %	1·35	0·43	0·339	0·73, 2·54	1·61	0·53	0·145	0·85, 3·07
>5 %	2·07	0·47	0·001	1·33, 3·23	2·09	0·49	0·001	1·33, 3·28
High school level
Disfavoured soda sales tax (0–7·5 %)	1·57	0·18	<0·001	1·25, 1·98	1·58	0·19	<0·001	1·26, 1·99
Disfavoured soda tax tertiles
0 %		Referent					Referent
>0–5 %	1·79	0·57	0·064	0·97, 3·34	2·12	0·69	0·021	1·12, 4·03
>5 %	2·45	0·57	<0·001	1·55, 3·85	2·46	0·58	<0·001	1·54, 3·91

Significant P values are indicated in bold font.

*OR adjusted for state and year by ordered logistic regression.