Table 2.
Performance of the candidate attractive targeted sugar bait (ATSB) when tested in bare chambers without vegetation
| Parameter estimated | Trap used | Intervention | Mean (95% CI) | % Reduction | OR 95% CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indoor-biting risk | CDC light traps | No ATSBs | 19.8 (18.6–20.9) | 79.8 (78.9–81.1) | 1 | < 0.001 |
| ATSBs added | 4.0 (3.5–4.4) | 5.4(3.8–7.6) | ||||
| Outdoor-biting risk | Human landing catches (HLC) | No ATSBs | 47.2 (44.9–49.5) | 69.7 (68.3–71.0) | 1 | < 0.001 |
| ATSBs added | 14.3 (13.0–15.7) | 3.9(2.8–5.5) | ||||
| Resting densities (indoors and outdoors) | Prokopack aspirators | No ATSBs | 43.6 (37.1–50.1) | 92.8 (91.6–94.6) | 1 | < 0.001 |
| ATSBs added | 3.1 (2.0–4.2) | 17.8(10.6–29.9) |