Irahara 2001.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods | Trial design: Randomised controlled trial | |
| Participants | Participants: 21 women were randomised and analysed. Mean age: Group 1: 36.0 ±10.0 years, group 2: 35.5 ± 8.6 years Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: not stated Setting: Japan Timing: not stated |
|
| Interventions | Group 1: monthly injection of 3.75 mg leuprolide acetate depot (n = 10) versus Group 2: monthly injection of 3.75 mg leuprolide acetate + 0.625 mg conjugated equine oestrogen + 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate every other day from 2nd month of GnRHa treatment (n = 11) |
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes | Intention‐to‐treat analysis: not stated Sample size calculation: not stated Funding: not stated Author contacted for further information; awaiting response |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised controlled trial. No further details of method used to generate the randomisation sequence were provided. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details of method used to conceal allocation were provided. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details provided of blinding of participants or personnel |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details provided of blinding of outcome assessment |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No losses to follow‐up |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The study protocol was not available but it was clear that the published reports included all expected outcomes, including those that were prespecified. |
| Other bias | Low risk | No other risk of bias detected |