Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 4;157(1):11–21. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_555_20

Table III.

Diagnostic performance of AI/ML protocols in the included studies

Study Sensitivity of the AI/ML protocol (%) Specificity of the AI/ML protocol (%) Accuracy of the AI/ML protocol (%) PPV of the AI/ML protocol (%) NPV of the AI/ML protocol (%) Performance of AI/ML diagnosis as compared to human diagnosis
Kok et al13, 1996 NA NA NA NA NA AI is similar to human diagnosis
Chang et al14, 1999 92 84 88.4 NA NA AI improves human diagnosis
Nieminen et al15, 2002 NA 92.5 NA 55 NA AI is similar to human diagnosis
de Veld et al16, 2004 NA NA NA NA NA Comparison not performed
Dreiseitl et al9, 2009 72 82 NA NA NA Depends on the user’s background
Lucidarme et al17, 2010 98 88 NA NA NA AI improves human diagnosis
Fink et al18, 2017 100 68.5 2.3 2.80 100 Comparison not performed
Mori et al8, 2018 NA NA 98.1 NA 93.7 to 96.5 AI is better than human diagnosis
Walker et al19, 2019 86 (system B); 91 (system A)1 69 (system B)1 NA 88.9 88.9 Comparison not performed
Wang et al20, 2019 NA NA NA NA NA AI improves human diagnosis
Su et al21, 2019 NA NA NA NA NA AI improves human diagnosis
Li et al22, 2019 86.2 NA NA 57.0 NA AI is better than human diagnosis
Hollon et al23, 2020 NA NA 94.6 NA NA AI is better than human diagnosis
Wang et al24, 2020 NA NA NA NA NA AI is better than human diagnosis
Repici et al25, 2020 NA NA NA NA NA AI improves human diagnosis
Gong et al26, 2020 NA NA NA NA NA AI improves human diagnosis
Wang et al27, 2020 NA NA NA NA NA AI improves human diagnosis
Liu et al28, 2020 NA NA NA NA NA AI improves human diagnosis

1System A is a deep learning classifier whose outputs from image processing of pigmented skin lesions were converted into sound waves, which were once again classified by system B. PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value