Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: NMR Biomed. 2022 Dec 14;36(5):e4867. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4867

Figure 10:

Figure 10:

Comparison of standard spin echo imaging (top row), VAT (middle), and SEMAC (bottom row) methods for a patient with a spinal implant. The right column is reformatted so slice direction is along the horizontal axis. The SE image is badly distorted in both frequency and slice directions, the VAT images are partially corrected in the frequency direction with substantial slice distortion, while the SEMAC image is corrected in both directions. (Images reused from [120] with permission.)