Table 2.
Influences that facilitate and obstruct patients’ and partners’ cancer-related dyadic efficacy.
| Category | Subtheme | Facilitator | Obstacle |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. Appraisals couples made about the quality of their relationship and the meanings attributed to togetherness | |||
| A1 | Quality of the couple relationship | Stable couple relationship | Weak couple relationship |
| A2 | Togetherness | Valued togetherness | Devalued togetherness |
| B. Individual and dyadic communication patterns and preferences for cancer-related information | |||
| B1 | Communication pattern | Congruent pattern | Incongruent pattern Lack of communication |
| B2 | Interest in cancer-related information | Shared interest | Disinterest |
| C. Coping strategies used and evaluations made about the chosen strategy | |||
| C1 | Dominant coping strategy | – | Avoidant coping |
| C2 | Evaluation of partner’s coping strategies | Acceptance of partner’s coping | Disapproval of partner’s coping |
| D. How changes to the division of everyday tasks and the couples’ sex life were managed | |||
| D1 | Tasks and roles | Flexibility | Lack of awareness |
| D2 | Sex life | Patience | – |