Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;2023(6):CD001423. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001423.pub4
Study Reason for exclusion
Adriazola Semino 1992 Wrong study design/comparison: Serenoa repens vs active control (Prazosin). No indication of randomization
Al‐Shukri 2000 Wrong study design: non‐randomized study
Alcaraz 2022 Wrong study design: observational study
Ali 2020 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs alpha‐blockers
Aliaev 2009 Wrong study population: men had chronic abacterial prostatitis
Authié 1987 Wrong study design: non‐randomized study
Bartsch 1998 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs finasteride
Braeckman 1997 Wrong comparison: different doses of Serenoa repens
Cai 2013 Wrong comparison: IDIProst vs Serenoa repens
Carraro 1996 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs finasteride
Comar 1986 Comparison with mepartricin
CTRI/2012/10/003049 Wrong comparison: different doses of phytotherapy
CTRI/2020/09/027521 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs SAW‐1720
Debruyne 2002 Wrong comparison: with alpha‐blocker
Di Maida 2020 Wrong study design: non‐randomized comparative study
Di Silverio 1992 Tissue study investigating the antiestrogenic effect of Serenoa repens vs placebo
Duborija‐Kovacevic 2010 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs doxazosin and finasteride
Engelmann 2006 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs tamsulosin
EUCTR2011‐005307‐33‐FR Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs tamsulosin
Gerber 1998 Wrong study design: no control group
Giannakopoulos 2002 Wrong study design: no control group
Giulianelli 2012 Wrong study design: observational study
Grasso 1995 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs alpha‐blocker
Gurzhenko 2020 Wrong study design: observational study
Guzman 2016 Wrong comparison: D‐004 vs Serenoa repens
Hamdv 1997 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs finasteride
Ju 2015 Wrong study design: no comparison
Latil 2015 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs alpha‐blockers
Morgia 2013 Wrong study population: men subject to histologic sampling
Morgia 2018 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs tadalafil
NCT00797394 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens as a co‐intervention
Pannunzio 1986 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs gestonorone caproate
Pavone 2010 Wrong study design: not a randomized controlled trial
Pecoraro 2004 Wrong population: study focused on the use of the drug as preoperative adjuvant treatment
Popa 2005 Wrong study design: independent re‐analysis of the included study Metzker 1996
Romaniuk 2013 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs doxazosin and finasteride
Roveda 1994 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens oral vs rectal route
Sinescu 2011 Wrong study design: non‐randomized study
Stepanov 1999 Wrong study design: no control group
Strauch 1994 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs finasteride
Suardi 2014 Wrong patient population: men with prostatitis
Sökeland 1997 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs finasteride
Taieb 2010 Wrong study design: observational study
Vela‐Navarrete 2005 Study focused on tissue samples of the prostate.
Veltri 2002 Wrong study population: study focused on prostatic tissue
Vinarov 2010 Wrong study design: no active or placebo control
Weisser 1997 Wrong study population: prostatic tissue (enzyme study)
Yamanishi 2004 Wrong comparison: Serenoa repens vs alpha‐blockers
Zlotta 2005 Wrong study design: re‐analysis of previous studies