Skip to main content
. 2023 May 3;12(4):1881–1891. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00711-2

Table 3.

Analysis of influencing factors associated with posterior capsular opacification in highly myopic eyes

Variables Eyes (n) Clinically significant PCO P-value
Age (years)
 < 60 192 46.4% (89/192)
 60–70 339 44.0% (149/339)
 > 70 142 29.6% (42/142) 0.004
Gender
 Male 262 40.5% (106/262)
 Female 411 42.3% (174/411) 0.688
Follow-up duration (years)
 1–2 128 15.6% (20/128)
 2–3 244 36.1% (88/244)
 > 3 301 57.1% (172/301) < 0.001
Diabetes
 With 57 38.6% (22/57)
 Without 616 41.9% (258/616) 0.827
IOL type
 Humanoptics 346 40.5% (140/346)
 Rayner 327 42.8% (140/327) 0.584
IOL power (D)
 < 10D 376 48.7% (183/376)
 ≥ 10D 297 32.7% (97/297) < 0.001
IOL thickness (mm)
 < 0.74 mm 342 43.6% (149/342)
 ≥ 0.74 mm 331 39.6% (131/331) 0.294

EPCO Evaluation of posterior capsular opacification, PCO-3 mm EPCO score within the central 3.0 mm zone, PCO-C EPCO score within the capsulorhexis margin, Nd:YAG neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet, IOL intraocular lens

Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation or percentage (proportion)

Difference of clinically significant PCO rate among different groups was analyzed by χ2 test