Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;14:3724. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39287-7

Table 2.

Multivariate survival analysis (proportional hazards regression model) of breast cancer patients (METABRIC-Discovery cohort)

Variable n Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95 % CI) p-value HR (95 % CI) p-value
Tumor size
< 20 mm 263 1.00 <0.0005 1.00 0.006
> 20 mm 589 2.05 (1.47–2.86) 1.62 (1.15–2.28)
Histologic grade
1-2 443 1.00 <0.0005 1.00 0.070
3 409 1.86 (1.41–2.46) 1.33 (0.98–1.80)
Lymph node status
Negative 453 1.00 <0.0005 1.00 <0.0005
Positive 399 2.25 (1.70–2.98) 1.83 (1.38–2.45)
PAM50 subtype a
Luminal-likeb 734 1.00 <0.0005 1.00 NS
Basal-like 118 1.91 (1.37–2.68) 1.26 (0.87–1.82)
33P hypoxia stromal signature
Q123 639 1.00 <0.0005 1.00 0.001
Q4 213 2.120 (1.60–2.81) 1.67 (1.23–2.27)

Statistical test: Two-sided Wald test. Adjustment for multiple testing was not performed.

CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, n number of patients, NS not significant.

aOnly patients with luminal A, luminal B and basal-like breast cancers were included (n=852, METABRIC-Discovery cohort).

bLuminal-like: patients with luminal A and luminal B breast cancer subtypes.