Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;14:3728. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39295-7

Fig. 4. NBEAL2 is involved in CTLA-4 expression after TCR activation.

Fig. 4

a Representative gating strategy for one healthy donor (HD) and one NBEAL2-deficient patient on CD4 + T cells. Tregs were defined as CD4+CD25+CD127low T cells. b Representative histograms of CTLA-4 and FOXP3 expression on CD25+CD127low Treg for one healthy donor (HD) and one NBEAL2-deficient patient. c Normalized CTLA-4 mean of fluorescence intensity (MFI) in CD25+CD127low Treg from controls (N = 6) and NBEAL2-deficient patients (N = 7). Mean ± SEM is represented. d Gating strategy to define CTLA-4 positive T cells after activation. The gating was tuned using a control isotype antibody. e Normalized CTLA-4 mean of fluorescence intensity (MFI) of activated T cells from controls (N = 4) and NBEAL2-deficient patients (N = 8). Mean ± SEM is represented. Two-tailed p-value is determined with a non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. f, g Diagram of the primary structure of NBEAL2 (f) and LRBA (g) proteins. Positions targeted by the CRISPR guide RNA used are indicated. h, i NBEAL2 (h) and LRBA (i) immunoblotting after CRISPR-Cas9 experiment on activated T cells. WT: refers to cells that underwent nucleofection without CRISPR/Cas9 in the solution. Ctrl: refers to cells nucleofected with a scramble guide and the Cas9. AAVS1: refers to cells transfected with a the Cas9 and a guide targeting an intronic position of the genome. Other cell lysates correspond to NBEAL2-CRISPR/Cas9 treatment (f) and LRBA-CRISPR/Cas9 treatment (g). Ku-70 is used as a loading control. j Normalized CTLA-4 MFI after CRISPR-Cas9 knockdown (KD) experiment for each mRNA guide (6 for NBEAL2; 5 for LRBA) used on three independent healthy donors activated T cells, over 2 independent experiments. Mean ± SEM is represented. Controls correspond to the three conditions Ctrl, WT, and AAVS1 described in h and i for each donor tested. Non-parametric two-sided Kruskal-Wallis test corrected with Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons was used to compare each group. k Immunoprecipitation (IP) of CTLA-4 in activated (+) or unstimulated (−) T cells from healthy donors. NBEAL2, LRBA, and CTLA-4 were immunoblotted on input fractions and on the IP fractions, as indicated (blots representative of N = 3 experiments). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.