Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;13:10130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35904-z

Table 4.

Multiple regression results for FGA single and dual-task conditions for healthy participants.

B 95% CI for B SE B β R2 ΔR2
LL UL
FGA
 Model 0.25 0.22
  Constant 33.14*** 30.99 35.29 1.07
  RTI − 0.01*** − 0.02 − 0.01 0.00 − 0.43***
  SWM − 0.03*** − 0.04 − 0.01 0.01 − 0.45***
FGA-M
 Model 0.15 0.14
  Constant 30.22*** 29.30 31.14 0.46
  Age − 0.03** − 0.04 − 0.01 0.01 − 0.39**
FGA-N
 Model 0.26 0.24
  Constant 36.29*** 30.03 42.54 3.12
  RTI − 0.03** − 0.05 − 0.01 0.01 − 0.35**
  SWM − 0.09*** − 0.13 − 0.05 0.02 − 0.51***
FGA-L
 Model 0.21 0.18
  Constant 24.84*** 22.37 27.03 1.23
  Gender 1.66* 0.19 3.13 0.73 0.27*
  PAL − 0.78* − 0.13 − 0.03 0.02 − 0.39*

Model, “Backward” method in SPSS statistics 27; B, unstandardised regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval; LL, lower limit and UL, upper limit; SE B, standard error of the coefficient; β, standardized coefficient; R2, coefficient of determination; ΔR2, adjusted R2; FGA, Functional Gait Assessment; FGA- M, -N and -L, FGA performed simultaneously with motor, numeracy or literacy task; RVP, Rapid Visual Information Processing; PAL, Paired Associates Learning; RTI, reaction time; ABC, Activities of Balance Confidence Scale. *p ≤ 0.05 **p ≤ 0.01 ***p ≤ 0.001.