Table 2.
Comparison of CryoPPP, Topaz, and crYOLO on two EMPIAR DATASETS.
| EMPIAR ID | Metric | Topaz | crYOLO | CryoPPP | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10081 | Number of Particles Picked | 135,978 | 17,550 | 37,387 | ||||||||||
| GSFSC Resolution (Å) | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | |||||
| 6.90 | 6.75 | 6.96 | 9.56 | 9.61 | 9.33 | 4.59 | 4.67 | 4.63 | ||||||
| 10345 | Number of Particles Picked | 40,324 | 4,095 | 15,894 | ||||||||||
| GSFSC Resolution (Å) | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | |||||
| 3.92 | 3.85 | 3.89 | 10.3 | 9.29 | 10.26 | 3.76 | 3.78 | 3.81 | ||||||
Bold font denotes the best resolution of the density map reconstructed from picked particles in the three trials.