Table 4.
The 3D density map result comparison on EMPIAR 10345 and EMPIAR 10406.
| EMPIAR 10345 | 3D Map Statistics (EMPIAR) | 3D Map Statistics (CryoPPP) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Picked Particles | 17,838 | 15,894 | ||||
| GSFSC Resolution (Å) | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 |
| 4.86 | 4.94 | 4.88 | 3.76 | 3.78 | 3.81 | |
| No Mask Resolution (Å) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Loose Mask Resolution (Å) | 7.3 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.9 |
| Tight Mask Resolution (Å) | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 |
| Corrected Mask Resolution (Å) | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
| EMPAIR 10406 | ||||||
| Number of Picked Particles | 23, 450 | 24,703 | ||||
| GSFSC Resolution (Å) | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 |
| 2.85 | 2.89 | 2.86 | 2.89 | 2.9 | 2.93 | |
| No Mask Resolution (Å) | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.2 |
| Loose Mask Resolution (Å) | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Tight Mask Resolution (Å) | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
| Corrected Mask Resolution (Å) | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.0 |