Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 21;4(6):401–413. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.02.007

Table 1.

Major studies for CNA in patients with vasovagal syncope

Study Study design Number of patients Age (y) Follow-up duration (mo) Technique Results
LA (±RA)
Piotrowski et al, 202328 RCT 48 38 ± 10 24 LA and RA EGM guided Syncope in 8% in the CNA group, 54% in control group; improved QOL with CNA
Pachon et al, 201121 Observational 43 33 ± 15 45 ± 22 LA, RA: Spectral and anatomic 80% syncope free
Pachon et al, 202029 Observational 25 36 ± 19 24 LA, RA: Spectral and anatomic No recurrent syncope
Hu et al, 201911 Observational 115 43 ± 17 21 ± 13 LA: Anatomic and HFS 92% without recurrent syncope or presyncope
Aksu et al, 202010 Observational 51 36 ± 12 15 (8–29) LA and RA: EGM and HFS No recurrent syncope
Huang et al, 202030 Observational 49 42 ± 16 16 RA and LA anatomic 92% without recurrent syncope or presyncope
Xu et al, 202231 Observational 108 51 ± 15 8 LA: anatomic and HFS 84% syncope-free
Tung et al, 202232 Observational (abstract) 71 47 8.5 LA/RA varied 82% syncope-free
RA only
Debruyne et al, 202133 Observational 20 41 ± 19 6 RA anatomic (with imaging) 95% reduction in syncope burden
Calo et al, 202122 Observational 18 37 ± 11 34 ± 6 RA anatomic and EGM Recurrent syncope in 17% and 28% with only prodromal episodes
Candemir et al, 202234 Observational 23 41 ± 13 10 ± 2.9 RA anatomic 96% syncope-free

Values are mean ± SD or median (interquartile range), unless otherwise indicated.

CNA = cardioneuroablation; EGM = electrogram; HFS = high-frequency stimulation; QOL = quality of life; RA = right atrium; RCT = randomized controlled trial.