Table 2.
The list of the findings of the relevant studies regarding the effect of aPDT on endodontic biofilm.
| Photosensitizer | Light source | Microorganism | Biofilm growth/substrate | Reduction in microbial load | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBO, MB (0.1 mg/mL) Cur (1 mg /mL) ICG (5 mg/mL) |
MB-aPDT: 660 nm, diode laser, 117.18 J/cm2 TBO-aPDT: 635 nm, diode laser, 171.87 J/cm2 ICG-aPDT: 810 nm, diode laser, 171.87 J/cm2 Cur-aPDT: 450 nm, LED, 300–420 J/cm2 |
E. faecalis | 24 h/12-well plate | Cur-aPDT: 99.6% ICG-aPDT: 98.2% TBO-aPDT: 85.1% MB-aPDT: 65.0% |
Pourhajibagher et al. (2018c) |
| Cur (40 mM) ICG (1 mg/mL) |
ICG-aPDT: 810 nm,diode laser, 250 mW Cur-aPDT: 450 nm, LED, 1000–1,400 mW/cm2 |
E. faecalis | 24 h/Flat-bottomed microplates | Cur-aPDT: 83.6% ICG-aPDT: 75.2% |
Pourhajibagher et al. (2018b) |
| ICG (1 mg/mL) | ICG-aPDT: 810 nm,diode laser, 31.2 J/cm2 | E. faecalis | 14 d/Human single-rooted teeth | ICG-aPDT: 81.6% | Bolhari et al. (2018) |
| MB (100 μg/mL) | 660 nm, diode laser, 150 mW, 6 J | E. faecalis | 21 d/Single-rooted teeth | 98.8% | Asnaashari et al. (2019) |
| MB (100 μg/mL) | 660 nm, diode laser, 150 mW, 6 J | E. faecalis | 21 d/Human single-rooted teeth | Apical: 90.7% Coronal: 56% |
Armand et al. (2019) |
| TB (0.1 mg/mL) | 810 nm, diode laser, 200 mW | E. faecalis | 7 d/Human single-rooted teeth | 2.615 log10 | Armand et al. (2019) |
| Riboflavin (0.1 mg/mL) |
810 nm, diode laser, 100 mW, 100 HZ | E. faecalis, S. aureus and C. albicans mixed biofilm | 15 d/Human single-rooted teeth | 99.9999977% | Katalinic et al. (2019) |