Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 21;15:17588359231182386. doi: 10.1177/17588359231182386

Table 2.

Biomarker status of patients with mCRC treated with 1L bevacizumab-awwb.

Biomarker a Naïve patients (n = 129) Switchers (n = 105)
KRAS test, n (%) 105 (81.4%) 81 (77.1%)
KRAS status among tested patients, n (%)
 Positive 49 (46.7%) 45 (55.6%)
 Negative 53 (50.5%) 36 (44.4%)
 Other b 3 (2.9%) 0
BRAF test, n (%) 96 (74.4%) 74 (70.5%)
BRAF status among tested patients, n (%)
 Positive 13 (13.5%) 8 (10.8%)
 Negative 81 (84.4%) 66 (89.2%)
 Other b 2 (2.1%) 0
NRAS test, n (%) 92 (71.3%) 66 (62.9%)
NRAS status among tested patients, n (%)
 Positive 6 (6.5%) 4 (6.1%)
 Negative 84 (91.3%) 61 (92.4%)
 Other c 2 (2.2%) 1 (1.5%)
MSI test, n (%) 93 (72.1%) 69 (65.7%)
MSI status among tested patients, n (%)
 Microsatellite instability – high (positive) 3 (3.2%) 2 (2.9%)
 Microsatellite instability – stable (negative) 86 (92.5%) 63 (91.3%)
 Other d 4 (4.3%) 4 (5.8%)
MMR test, n (%) 96 (75.2%) 74 (70.5%)
MMR status among tested patients, n (%)
 MMR deficient 7 (7.2%) 2 (2.7%)
 MMR proficient 89 (91.8%) 72 (97.3%)
a

Biomarker results were reported using the medical value that was recorded closest to metastatic CRC diagnosis.

b

Uninterpretable test results.

c

Insufficient quality or equivocal test results.

d

Insufficient quality, equivocal, or undetermined/undocumented test results.

1L, first-line; BRAF, B-rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; KRAS, Kirsten rat sarcoma; mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; MMR, mismatch repair; MSI, microsatellite instability; NRAS, neuroblastoma rat sarcoma.