Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 Sep 3;59(46):20470–20474. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009636

Table 1.

Optimization of reaction conditions[a][b]

graphic file with name nihms-1906327-t0007.jpg
Entry Variation from “standard conditions” conv. (3a) 4a 2d
1 none 100% 95% (93%) <5%
2 AgSbF6 100% 73% 25%
3 60 °C 100% 65% 30%
4 rt 20% 15% <5%
5 DCB as solvent 100% 89% 10%
6 MeOH as solvent 50% 45% <5%
7 Add 1 eq. K3PO4 100% 87% 10%
8 Add 1 eq. KOAc <5% 0% 0%
9 Mor-DalphosAuCl 5 mol% 20% 15% <5%
10 No [Au] 0% - -
11 No [Ag] 0% - -
12 No ArI No conversion on 1a
13 dppm(AuBr)2 10 mol%, ArB(OH)2, Selectfluor, MeCN/MeOH, 50 °C 20%
14 PPh3AuCl 10 mol%, ArN2BF4, [Ir] cat. MeOH, rt, hv 0%
[a]

Conditions: 1a (0.4 mmol), MeOH (0.6 mmol), 3a (0.2 mmol), Au cat. (0.01 mmol), AgOTf (0.21 mmol), DCM (2 mL), 40 °C, 12 h.

[b]

1H NMR yields using 1,3,5-tribromobenzene as an internal standard (isolated yields).