Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 9;14:1181651. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1181651

Table 3.

Grade of myodynamia of affected lower limb in each group n(%).

Time Myodynamia Control group Experimental group Z-valuea P-value
Baseline Level 0 6 (7.50) 3 (3.75) −0.158 0.874
Level 1 15 (18.75) 17 (21.25)
Level 2 20 (25.00) 19 (23.75)
Level 3 26 (32.50) 35 (43.75)
Level 4 12 (15.00) 6 (7.50)
Level 5 1 (1.25) 0 (0.00)
1 month of intervention Level 0 5 (6.25) 1 (1.25) −0.841 0.400
Level 1 15 (18.75) 16 (20.00)
Level 2 25 (31.25) 21 (26.25)
Level 3 25 (31.25) 34 (42.50)
Level 4 9 (11.25) 8 (10.00)
Level 5 1 (1.25) 0 (0.00)
3 months of intervention Level 0 4 (5.00) 0 (0.00) −3.47 0.001
Level 1 20 (25.00) 5 (6.25)
Level 2 24 (30.00) 27 (33.75)
Level 3 23 (28.75) 30 (37.50)
Level 4 8 (10.00) 18 (22.50)
Level 5 1 (1.25) 0 (0.00)
H-valueb 0.939 40.663
P-value 0.625 < 0.001
a

Mann–Whitney U-test for two independent samples.

b

Kruskal–Wallis H-test for three independent samples.