Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 8;31(3):174–183. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2082637

Table 3.

Comparison of mean difference of pain pressure thresholds and cervical alignment of the three groups post treatment.

Variable Groups Mean Difference 95% CI Cohens’ d
PPT UTrt
(Kg/cm2)
Group A-Group B .84* .34-1.35 1.7
Group A-Group C 1.18* .68-1.68 1.6
Group B-Group C .34 −.16-.84 .5
PPT UTlt
(Kg/cm2)
Group A-Group B .80* .35-1.25 1.6
Group A-Group C 1.09* .65-1.54 1.7
Group B-Group C .29 −.15-.74 .46
PPT Subrt
(Kg/cm2)
Group A-Group B .76* .39-1.12 1.9
Group A-Group C .94* .57-1.29 1.8
Group B-Group C .18 −.18-.54 .14
PPT Sublt
(Kg/cm2)
Group A-Group B .70* .30-1.09 1.6
Group A-Group C .74* .35-1.32 1.3
Group B-Group C .04 −.35-.43 0
CA(°) Group A-Group B 4.89* 1.72-8.06 1.6
Group A-Group C 5.68* 2.54-8.82 1.3
Group B-Group C .79 −2.35-3.92 0
AHT (mm) Group A-Group B −3.81* −6.31- −1.31 1.3
Group A-Group C −3.84* −6.32- −1.36 1.1
Group B-Group C −.034 −2.51-2.44 0

*P < 0.05; Group A: Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization; Group B: Pressure Algometry; Group C: Sham Ultrasound Control; CA: Cervical Lordosis Angle; AHT: Anterior Head Translation; PPT: Pain Pressure Threshold; UTrt: right upper trapezius; UTlt: left upper trapezius; Subrt: right suboccipital; Sublt: left suboccipital; CI: Confidence Interval.Cohens’ d values indicating a ‘small,’ ‘medium,’ and ‘large’ effect size are .20, .50, and .80 respectively