Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 27;12(2):e220193. doi: 10.2217/cer-2022-0193

Table 5. . Sensitivity analyses results.

Item CladT cost DMF cost CladT QALY DMF QALY Difference in costs Difference in QALY Cost per QALY gained/Cost–effectiveness probability
Base case 199,884€ 274,625€ 6.6577 6.4657 -74,741€ 0.1920 CladT is dominant: 94.1%
Time horizon
  20 years (10 years more) 355,683€ 513,685€ 11.3694 10.8033 -158,002€ 0.5661 CladT is dominant: 96.6%
  40 years (30 years more) 555,819€ 826,795€ 16.9660 15.6734 -270,976€ 1.2926 CladT is dominant: 96.6%
Treatment continuation after initial treatment
  Less than 20% of the base case cost 193,169€ 265,653€ 6.5382 6.3585 -72,484€ 0.1797 CladT is dominant: 95.5%
  Reduction in purchasing cost of CladT and DMF (20%) 184,671€ 249,421€ 6.8211 6.6131 -64,750€ 0.2080 CladT is dominant: 95.3%
  Societal perspective (including labor costs) 306,700€ 388,337€ 6.1883 6.0484 -81,637€ 0.1399 CladT is dominant: 94.1%
  20% discount on the price of CladT and 50% on the price of DMF 192,545€ 237,479€ 6.6727 6.4772 -44,934€ 0.1955 CladT is dominant: 95.3%

CladT treatment is dominant: it is more effective with lower costs, for a willingness to pay of 25,000 € per QALY gained.

CladT: Cladribine tablet; DMF: Dimethyl fumarate; QALY: Quality-adjusted life year.