Table 5. . Comparison of participants' quality of life, navicular drop test and fatigue values.
Group | Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | Z | p3 | F | p4 | Eta2 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
± s | %95 CI | Range | Z | p1 | ± s | %95 CI | Range | Z | p2 | |||||||
Quality of life | Physiotherapist | 78.82 ± 9.31 | 74.04–83.61 | 65–95 | -1.424 | 0.155 | 83.53 ± 9.39 | 78.7–88.36 | 74–105 | -2.068 | 0.039† | -1.684 | 0.092 | 0.090 | 0.766 | 0.003 |
Home program | 83.33 ± 7.44 | 79.64–87.03 | 72–95 | 89.78 ± 7.96 | 85.82–93.74 | 72–105 | -2.986 | 0.003† | ||||||||
Navicular drop (right) | Physiotherapist | 1.19 ± 0.56 | 0.9–1.48 | 0.5–2.2 | -0.151 | 0.880 | 1.04 ± 0.49 | 0.79–1.29 | 0.5–2 | -0.839 | 0.402 | -2.714 | 0.007† | 10.899 | 0.002† | 0.254 |
Home program | 1.25 ± 0.63 | 0.94–1.56 | 0.5–2.5 | 1.23 ± 0.63 | 0.92–1.55 | 0.5–2.5 | -0.447 | 0.655 | ||||||||
Navicular drop (left) | Physiotherapist | 1.16 ± 0.7 | 0.8–1.52 | 0.5–2.5 | -0.119 | 0.906 | 1.08 ± 0.62 | 0.76–1.39 | 0.5–2.4 | -0.170 | 0.865 | -2.264 | 0.024† | 2.976 | 0.094 | 0.085 |
Home program | 1.12 ± 0.59 | 0.83–1.41 | 0.5–2.5 | 1.09 ± 0.59 | 0.8–1.39 | 0.5–2.5 | -1.414 | 0.157 | ||||||||
Fatigue | Physiotherapist | 3.44 ± 1.15 | 2.85–4.03 | 1–5.1 | -0.456 | 0.648 | 4.29 ± 1.29 | 3.62–4.95 | 2–6 | -0.725 | 0.469 | -3.367 | 0.001† | 0.028 | 0.869 | 0.001 |
Home program | 3.03 ± 1.53 | 2.27–3.79 | 0–5 | 3.88 ± 1.47 | 3.14–4.61 | 1–5.8 | -3.771 | 0.000† |
p < 0.05.
CI: Confidence interval; Eta2: Effect size calculation; p1: Pre-treatment intergroup comparison; p2: Post-treatment intergroup comparison; p3: Pre-treatment post-treatment within-group comparison; p4: ANCOVA.