Skip to main content
. 2023 May 25;44(6):563–571. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003900

TABLE 1.

Patient demographics and EAC bony wall defect characteristics

No. Age, yr Sex Initial Symptom Symptom Onset Presumed Cause Previous Treatment Defect Site Defect Size (mm)a EAC Stenosis (Gr)b
1 M 40 Otalgia upon mastication 20 YA Mandible condylar fracture (23 YA) Mandible condylar fixation (20 YA) Lt 11.7 × 8.4 IV
2 M 48 Tinnitus upon mastication 3 YA, posttrauma Temporal bone fracture d/t
Traffic accident (3 YA)
No Lt 9.1 × 5.0 III
3 M 38 HL 1 DA, posttrauma Temporal bone fracture (13 YA) Mandible condyle, parasymphysis fracture. ORIF (13 YA) Rt 4.1 × 5.4 IV
4 M 68 EF 18 MA Spontaneous No Lt 7.4 × 6.7 IV
5 M 75 HL, otalgia 2 MA Spontaneous No Rt 11.3 × 8.7 IV
6 F 54 Otalgia upon mastication ns, over 4 MA Spontaneous No Rt 3.0 × 2.4 II
7 F 22 HL 2 WA, posttrauma EAC wall fracture (26 MA) No Lt 10.2 × 5.0 IV
8 M 65 Otalgia, tinnitus upon mastication 2 MA Radiation Biopsy (outside hospital) and Infection control Lt 11.2 × 16.8 IV
9 F 72 Otalgia 3MA Spontaneous No Rt 5.7 × 10.2 II
10 M 71 Otalgia, EF 3.5YA Spontaneous Defect site repair using medpore (7 MA, outside hospital) Rt 10.1 × 7.8 III

aAxial: maximum diameter on CT axial cut; coronal: number of CT axial cuts covering the EAC defect ×CT axial slice thickness.

bEAC stenotic portion width/EAC width measured at a single CT axial cut with maximal TMJ bulging (Gr. I: 0–25%, Gr. II: 25–50%, Gr. III: 50–75%, Gr. IV: 75–100%).

DA, days ago; EF, ear fullness; HL, hearing loss; Lt, left; MA, months ago; ORIF, open reduction and internal fixation; Rt, right; WA, weeks ago; YA, years ago.