Author ID |
Study Design |
Participant characteristics |
Metformin |
TZDs |
Follow-up (weeks) |
Main outcomes |
Pavo et al.,2003 [9] |
RCT |
205 patients (103 females and 102 males, aged at least 40 years) |
100 patients in the metformin group received a mean dosage of 2292 mg/d |
105 patients in the pioglitazone group received a mean dosage of 41.5 mg/d |
32 |
The patients in the pioglitazone group had a more pronounced HOMA-S than those in the metformin group (mean treatment difference, 16.37; SD, 6.77; P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the reduction of FPG between the two groups (-3.0 mmol/l vs. -2.8 mmol/l, p = 0.620 for pioglitazone and metformin, respectively). |
Schernthaner et al.,2004 [10] |
RCT |
1194 patients (659 males and 535 females) |
65, 146, and 339 patients were subjected to metformin dosages of 850mg, 1700mg, and 2550mg, respectively. |
78 and 475 patients were subjected to 30mg and 45mg of pioglitazone, respectively. |
52 |
The fasting insulin was significantly reduced in the pioglitazone group than in the metformin group (-2.4 µU/ml vs. 0 µU/ml, p<0.0001, respectively). The Mean change in the FPG was larger in patients receiving pioglitazone than in patients receiving metformin (-45.0±16.2 mg/dL vs. -39.6±16.2 mg/dL, respectively). 42 patients receiving pioglitazone and 39 receiving metformin were withdrawn from the study due to adverse events. |
Fidan et al.,2011 [11] |
|
40 patients (16 females and 24 males aged above 40 years) |
Metformin was initiated at 850 mg dosage and adjusted to 3 x 850 mg at 10-day intervals |
Rosiglitazone was initiated at 4mg and adjusted to 8 mg. |
12 |
At the end of 3 months, the decrease in HOMA-IR was not significant for patients receiving metformin (from 4.5±3.0 to 3.4±3.5), while a significant difference was observed in the rosiglitazone group (from 4.8 ± 3.4 to 2.8 ± 2.5, p<0.05). An insignificant difference in the FPG was observed in the metformin group (from 144 ± 24mg/dL to 130 ± 36mg/dL), while a significant change was recorded in the rosiglitazone group (from 149 ± 30mg/dL to 116 ± 20mg/dL p<0.05). |
Chu et al.,2002 [12] |
RCT |
22 patients (20 males and 2 females; mean age 56±2 years). |
12 patients were initially subjected to receive 850mg daily |
10 patients were initially subjected to 200mg troglitazone daily. |
16 |
An insignificant change in the FPG was recorded between the metformin and troglitazone groups (-32mg/dL vs. -36mg/dL, p=0.90). Both groups’ fasting insulin levels decreased; however, the difference was insignificant (-6mU/l vs. -18mU/l, p=0.30, for metformin and troglitazone, respectively). |
Hällsten et al.,2002 [13] |
RCT |
41 patients (28 males and 13 females) |
13 patients were initially subjected to 500mg of metformin for 2 weeks and thereafter 1g daily |
14 patients were initially subjected to 2mg of rosiglitazone for 2 weeks; thereafter, 4mg daily |
26 |
A significant change in FPG was recorded in the metformin group (from 8.0±0.5mmol/l to 6.8±0.3mmol/l, p < 0.001), while an insignificant decrease in FPG was recorded in the rosiglitazone group (from 7.2±0.3 to 6.8±0.3mmol/l). The decrease in fasting serum insulin was insignificant in both metformin (from 11.7± 2.1mU/l to 8.8±1.1mU/l) and rosiglitazone group (from 8.6±1.5 to 6.6±0.4). |
Kautzky-Willer et al.,2005 [14] |
RCT |
20 patients (14 males and 6 females) |
9 patients were initially subjected to an 850mg metformin dose once every day for 1 week; thereafter, the dose was given twice daily. |
11 patients were initially subjected to a 400mg daily dosage of troglitazone for 1 week; thereafter, the dose was adjusted to 600mg daily. |
16 |
A significant improvement in fasting insulin resistance (HOMA) was recorded in the troglitazone group (from 5.3±0.9 to 3.4±0.7), while the change was insignificant for the metformin group (from 6.3±0.9 to 4.1±0.8, respectively). |
Tiikkainen et al.,2004 [15] |
|
20 patients (13 females and 7 males) |
11 patients in the metformin group received 1g dosage for 16 weeks |
9 patients were subjected to 4mg of rosiglitazone for 16 weeks |
16 |
Fasting serum insulin decreased significantly in both groups; however, the statistical analysis showed that the difference was not significant (4±1 and 4±2mU/l for rosiglitazone and metformin groups, respectively) A significant decrease in FPG was recorded in rosiglitazone (from 8.8±0.8 to 7.3±0.4mmol/l) and metformin group (from 8.2±0.7 to 6.7±0.2mmol/l) |
Ceriello et al.,2005 [16] |
RCT |
940 patients (382 females and 558 males) |
195 patients were subjected to pioglitazone |
187 patients received metformin |
52 |
There was a statistically insignificant difference in the change of FPG between pioglitazone and metformin (-2.52±0.145 vs. -2.46±0.148mmol/l, respectively). Pioglitazone had a significantly higher reduction in fasting insulin than metformin (-12.77±2.40 vs. -4.59±2.44mmol/l). |
Roden et al.,2005 [17] |
RCT |
1788 patients (1005 males and 783 females aged 35 – 75 years) |
597 patients received metformin |
597 patients received pioglitazone |
52 |
A higher significant increase in insulin sensitivity was recorded among patients in the pioglitazone group than in the metformin group (p<0.001). A significantly higher reduction in fasting serum insulin was recorded among patients in the pioglitazone group (from −16.12±3.15 to −27.38 ± 2.17pmol/l). |
Basu et al.,2008 [18] |
RCT |
31 patients (15 females and 16 males) |
16 patients were subjected to 1000mg of metformin twice every day |
15 patients were subjected to 45mg of pioglitazone daily |
16 |
No significant change in fasting glucose was recorded in either patients receiving pioglitazone (from 157 ± 10 to 140 ± 13mg/dL) or metformin (from 148 ± 12 to 146 ± 10mg/dL). |