Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 23;8(3):e215. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000215

Table 3.

Analysis of the Likert scale questionnaire. Comparisons between trainees' and consultants' mean values for each answer. Data displayed in mean ± SD

Item Statement Trainees (n=76) Consultants (n=110) Total (n=186) P value
1 I consider debriefing an important tool 4.83±0.67 4.82±0.53 4.83±0.55 .368
2 Debriefing increases patient safety and contributes to outcome improvement 4.79±0.72 4.77±0.59 4.78±0.61 .384
3 The most senior doctor must establish the content of the debriefing 3.00±0.13 3.25±0.13 3.17±1.23 .053
4 Debriefing must be guided by someone not involved in the critical event 3.19±0.13 3.17±0.13 3.17±1.26 .061
5 Participants in debriefing should be impartial 3.88±0.12 4.00±0.12 3.96±1.15 .148
6 The debriefing of events with adverse outcomes are more than that of events with a successful outcome 2.39±0.14 2.32±0.13 2.37±1.33 .346
7 I consider that my institution has a proper culture of debriefing 1.96±0.12 1.95±0.96 1.96±1.03 .920
8 I consider having the adequate training to perform a debriefing 2.27±0.13 2.89±0.12 2.63±1.17 .003
9 I consider that there is a need for training in debriefing in my institution 4.35±0.09 4.30±0.08 4.37±0.86 .795