Background:
Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common, unpleasant, and upsetting complication of tracheal intubation that increases postoperative morbidity and causes patient dissatisfaction after general anaesthesia.
Objective:
To determine the prevalence and risk factors of POST following endotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia.
Materials and methods:
From 20 April to 20 May 2021, a multicenter prospective cohort study design and systematic random sampling were used to select study participants from patients over the age of 18 who underwent anaesthesia-assisted surgery with endotracheal intubation. A structured questionnaire was developed after reading some of the relevant literature. SPSS version 20 was used to enter and analyze the data, and binary logistic regression was used to select a variable for multivariable logistic regression. To identify statistically significant factors, a P value of 0.05 for the association between the independent and dependent variables was used in multivariable analysis.
Results:
Sore throat occurred in 94 (61.8%) of the 152 patients who had undergone surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. The size of the endotracheal intubation was found to have a p value of 0.04, (adjusted odds ratio 0.04, 95% CI 0.002–0.79), and the duration of the anaesthesia was found to have a p value of 0.003, (adjusted odds ratio 4.5, 95% CI 1.66–12.18). The POST was associated with a large endotracheal tube, patient age, and an extended period of anaesthesia in this study, with a prevalence of 94 (61.8%) cases.
Conclusion and recommendation:
In this study, the incidence of POST was high 94 (61.8%), large size endotracheal tube, patient age, and duration of anaesthesia were associated factors for POST. Awareness creation through training based on research findings should be made about the problem for all health professionals who were involved in postoperative patient care.
Keywords: endotracheal tube, sore throat following surgery
Introduction
Highlights
The incidence of postoperative sore throat (POST) in this study was 61.8%.
Size of endotracheal tube, duration of anaesthesia and age were risk factor for POST.
POST is listed from the top as the patients’ most undesirable outcome
Endotracheal intubation frequently results in sore throats, which can be highly upsetting for the patient and cause sleep disruptions and unpleasant recollections1. The tracheal mucosa has been observed to release inflammatory mediators after intubation, suggesting that the aetiology of postoperative sore throat (POST) is likely an inflammatory process, uncertainty exists regarding the precise anatomical location of neck pain in patients2,3-5.
Most research studies report varying rates of POST, but some claim the rate is higher after general anaesthesia, this high variability is caused by a number of factors, including the type of airway device used, the technique of insertion, use or type of lubricant, cuff pressure, length of procedure, and anaesthesia, agent used, evaluation methods, and a variety of patient characteristics6–9.
POST complaints can range in severity from slight throat irritation to incapacitating discomfort that prevents swallowing, and transitory voice alterations are frequently noticed during the postoperative visit, while rarely delaying release, these concerns nonetheless have an impact on patient satisfaction and may limit their ability to engage in certain activities after leaving the hospital, the recovery from a pharyngolaryngeal damage can often take months, and in certain situations, it may even be permanent, in many circumstances, the interference can result in trauma, foreign body contamination, mucosal dryness, and airway irritation, all of which might present in different ways in the postoperative period10–13.
Many different methods, both non-pharmacological and pharmacological, have been explored to lessen POST, with varying degrees of success. Non-pharmacological techniques include using a smaller endotracheal tube (ETT), applying water-soluble gel to the ETT, being careful during airway instrumentation, waiting until complete relaxation before intubation, performing gentle oropharyngeal suction, reducing intra-cuff pressure, minimizing cuff inflation, and deflating the tracheal tube completely. These methods have been found to reduce the likelihood of POST. Pharmacological measures, such as using lignocaine, steroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and gargling with azulene sulfonic acid, have also been shown to decrease the incidence of POST5–12.
Several studies have been conducted globally on the prevalence of POST and its risk factors for POST and risk factors are numerous6–9. Much research was done worldwide regarding the incidence of POST and its associated risk factors are/is overwhelming. For a long time, few studies have been performed to determine the incidence of POST and to find measures for its prevention, most of these Studies have been done in developed and limited studies have been done on predictors of POST in developing countries where resources and qualified man powers are limited5,14. Therefore, this research aimed to assess the magnitude and associated factors of POST, and this research will help to minimize combinations of risk factors reduce the incidence, severity of POST, raise awareness of the variables associated with an increased incidence of POST and increase postoperative patient satisfaction.
Method and material
Study area
This study was conducted at Ambo University Referral Hospital and Ambo General Hospital, which is located in the West Shoa Zone, Oromia region of Ethiopia, about 114 Km from Addis Ababa. The hospital is serving more than 2 million people in the catchment area. Specialty surgical units, internal medicine, paediatrics, gynaecology and obstetrics, ear nose throat, and other minor departments are among the many healthcare services offered by the hospital. The hospital was supposed to serve an estimated 3.5 million people, and perform an average of 1800 surgeries each year. Orthopaedic, maxillofacial, dental, ophthalmology, general surgery, gynaecologic, and obstetric specialty units performed the majority of surgeries. Registered in the Research Registry and UIN= 8169 and the methodology in this study has been reported according to STROSS guidelines 20213,4.
Study period: The study was conducted from 20 April to 20 May 2021.
Study design: Prospective cohort
Source population
All patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation
Study population
Patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation who met inclusion criteria during the study period
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification I, II, and ages 18 and above performed under endotracheal intubation were included in the study.
Exclusion criteria
Patients whose surgery is performed in the neck, mouth, or throat area, recent or ongoing upper respiratory infection, double lumen tubes, and existing preoperative sore throat cases were excluded from the study.
Study variables
Dependent
POST (yes or no)
Independent
Age, sex, body mass index, the urgency of the case, ETT size, use of airways, ASA classification, duration of anaesthesia, number of attempts during laryngoscopy and intubation, diagnosis of the patient, and mallampathy class of pt.
Sample size and sampling technique
Sample size
The sample size was determined by taking the following assumptions: the incidence of POST was found 46% in Black lion specialized hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. [16], a confidence interval of 95% and a margin of error of 0.05. The sample size was determined using the following single population proportion formula.
The used Formula was:
n=Z 2 (P) (1−p)/d 2= = 382
Whereas;
n= sample size required
Z=the standard normal variable with 95% CI (1.96)
P = Prevalence (46%)
d = margin of sampling error to be tolerated = 5% (0.05)
To get the sample size with confidence interval of 95% and margin of error 5%,
However; the total population who was admitted within the study period was less than 10 000 so adjustment formula was used by applying a finite population correction formula, the sample size was calculated as;
nf=n/ (1+n/N)
Were n= the minimum sample size =382
N=Total number of patients underwent surgery =215
nf=the final required sample size (adjusted sample size).
Therefore, nf= 382/ (1+382/215) =138.
By adding non respondents rate=10%, 138×10/100=14+138 =152 was calculated sample size
Three months’ patient report who underwent surgery were 645 in AURH and 390 in AGH from report.so the size of one month was 215 and 130, respectively, and was 95 participants from AURH and 57 from GH that became final sample size of 152 from both hospitals.
To get the study participants of two hospitals (AURH and AGH), it is calculated as: ni=(n/N) ×Ni
Where ni is the required number of sample size of each hospital, n is the total calculated sample size, N is the total surgery of both hospitals.
Ni is the total surgery size of each hospital.
For;-
xx: ni=(n/N) ×Ni; ni=152 ×130/345 = 57
xxx: ni=(n/N) ×Ni ; ni=152×215/345 = 95
Sampling technique
Systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants. The calculated sample size was 152. So, sampling interval (k) was calculated as follows.
K=N/n where, n = total sample size
345/152= 2 for both AURH and AGH k=sampling interval
N = Total study population
Therefore, 2 was the sampling interval and the first study participant was selected from the first two cases of the list by lottery method.
The first study participant was the second case from the list of surgery and the consequent cases would be 4, 6, and 8, up to 345. for example.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ---345 |
Data collection technique and instrument
Data were collected using questionnaires prepared in English and then translated into Afan Oromo. Data were collected by two trained anaesthetist and follow-up was made for every patient postoperatively for 24 h. Number of attempts during laryngoscopy to intubate the trachea, size of ETT employed, duration of anaesthesia, demographic variables, and overall medical condition of the patients were recorded.
Data quality control
Pretests were made in one of West Shoa hospitals on 5% of the participants, orientation and training about the objective and process of data collection were given to two Anaesthetists before data collection. Cross-checking was made during data collection by the supervisor.
Data analysis and interpretation
The data were coded and entered into the SPSS version 20 statistical package. All independent variables were analyzed by binary logistic regression with the dependent variable POST and those with a p value less than or equal to 0.2 from the bivariate analysis were fitted to multivariate logistic regression to verify their association with the outcome variable POST. The odds ratio, 95% CI, and p value were calculated to identify associated factors and to determine the strength of the association. A p value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test of goodness of fit was performed to check the suitability of the model for the analysis.
Operational definition
POST: Within 24 h. of the surgery, patients felt of either pain, discomfort, or both during swallowing.
Ethical consideration
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethical review committee of the college of health science, at Ambo Univeristy Referral Hospital and the letter was given to xxx and xxx for support and permission. Permission was obtained from the Anaesthesia department after a clearance letter was submitted to conduct the research. Informed verbal consent was obtained from respondents after giving them information about the study. In addition, all the responses were kept confidential and anonymous.
Result
Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants
The study was conducted on total of 152 patients who underwent surgery by general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. In this study 150 (98.7%) of the respondents age were between 18–65 years, 107 (70.4%) were female (Table 1).
Table 1.
Socio-demographic characteristics of study+ participants (N=152)
Variables | Frequency | Percent (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Age | 18–65 years | 150 | 98.7 |
>65 years | 2 | 1.3 | |
Sex | Male | 45 | 29.6 |
Female | 107 | 70.4 | |
BMI | <18.5 | 42 | 27.6 |
18.5–24.9 | 88 | 57.9 | |
25–29.5 | 22 | 14.5 |
Anaesthesia and surgery related characteristics of study participant
The majority of patients 118 (95.9%) were underwent elective surgery. The majority of the study participants, 112 (73.7%) were underwent general surgery procedures. Among the participants 59 (38.8%) were intubated with a 6.5 mm tube, 23 (15.1%) were intubated with 6.0 ETT size, and 130 (85.5%) were intubated by laryngoscopy size number three. The duration of anaesthesia and surgery in the study was 1.57 min mean duration. In the study period, the minimum duration that the patients stayed under anaesthesia was 1 h, and the maximum was 3 h. This study also showed that N= 22(14%) of the patients stayed more than 2 h N=42(28%) of the patients stayed 1–2 h and N=88(58%) of the patients stayed less than 1 h under anaesthesia (Table 2).
Table 2.
Anesthetic and surgery related characteristics of study participants (N = 123)
Variables | Frequency | Percent (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Diagnosis | Surgery case | 62 | 40.8 |
Gynaecologic case | 13 | 8.6 | |
Obstetric case | 72 | 47.4 | |
orthopaedics case | 5 | 3.3 | |
Urgency of cases | Elective | 112 | 73.7 |
Emergency | 40 | 26.3 | |
Mallampati classification | Class 1 | 54 | 35.5 |
Class 2 | 95 | 62.5 | |
Class 3 | 3 | 2 | |
ETT size | 5.5 ID | 4 | 2.6 |
6.0 ID | 23 | 15.1 | |
6.5 ID | 59 | 38.8 | |
7.0 ID | 10 | 6.6 | |
7.5 ID | 56 | 36.8 | |
Size of laryngoscope blade | Number 3 | 130 | 85.5 |
Number 4 | 22 | 14.5 | |
Size of NGT | 16F | 1 | 3.9 |
18F | 4 | 2.6 | |
Duration of Anaesthesia | <1 h | 88 | 57.9 |
1–2 h | 42 | 27.6 | |
>2 h | 22 | 14.5 | |
ASA classification | ASA I | 100 | 65.8 |
ASA II | 52 | 34.2 |
ASA, American society of Anesthesiology; ETT, endotracheal tube; NGT, naso gastric tube.
Incidence of POST of the study participant
The incidence of POST in this study was 94 (61.8%)The highest occurrence of POST was within 6 h which were 45% followed by 25% within the next 12 h and 24% within 24 h (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Proportional allocation of study participants for each hospital.
Factors associated with POST in bivariate analysis
On bivariate analysis age, sex, size of endotracheal tube, duration of anaesthesia, ASA classification, and urgency of surgery were associated factors for POST.
Multivariate analysis result of factors associated with POST
Duration of anaesthesia p value of 0.003, adjusted odds ratio= 4.5, 95% CI: (1.66–12.18). age older than 65 with p value less than 0.001, (adjusted odds ratio= 3.5,95% CI; (1.03–1.1) were associated factors for POST and this study also revealed that larger size of ETT was associated with the occurrence of the POST with p values of 0.03, 0.029, and 0.001for ETT sizes of 6.5, 7.0, and 7.5, respectively (Table 3).
Table 3.
Factors associated with postoperative sore throat of patients who underwent general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation (N=152)
POST | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | Yes (n) | No (n) | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | P | |
Age | 18–65 | 43 | 106 | 1 | 1 | |
>65 | 2 | 1 | 4.9 (1.03–1.1) | 3.5 (1.03–1.1) | 0.04 | |
Sex | M | 17 | 28 | 1 | 1 | |
F | 29 | 78 | 0.61 (0.29–1.28) | 1.63 (0.78–3.42) | 0.19 | |
Size of ETT | 6.0 | 14 | 29 | 1 | 1 | |
6.5 | 24 | 21 | 3.2 (1.21, 8.232) | 3.8 (1.4, 10.7) | 0.03 | |
7.0 | 20 | 15 | 4.2 (1.46, 11.91) | 3.6 (1.149, 11.2) | 0.029 | |
7.5 | 16 | 11 | 4.6 (1.42, 15.08) | 4.1 (1.140, 14.29) | 0.001 | |
Duration of anaesthesia | ≤2 h | 37 | 93 | 1 | 1 | |
>2 h | 11 | 11 | 2.33 (0.45–3.76) | 4.5 (1.66–12.18) | 0.003 | |
ASA classification | ASA I | 46 | 54 | 1 | 1 | |
ASA II | 31 | 21 | 0.54 (0.37–0.78) | 3.43 (0.3–39.64) | 0.32 | |
Urgency of case | Elective | 15 | 25 | 1 | 1 | |
Emergency | 31 | 81 | 1.57 (0.73–3.36) | 0.64 (0.3–1.37 | 0.25 |
Where: 1=reference group.
AOR, adjusted odd ratio; ASA, American society of Anesthesiology; COR, crude odd ratio; ETT, endotracheal tube; n, number; POST, Postoperative sore throat.
Discussion
POST is a common, uncomfortable, and distressing consequence of tracheal intubation, contributing to postoperative morbidity and patient dissatisfaction following general anaesthesia15.
In our study, the incidence of POST was 61.8%, comparable to the cross-sectional study by Melkamu and colleagues in Gondar with 240 participants16. But our results were better than the study conducted at Toronto Western Hospital. 12.1% said they had a sore throat13. The former is performed in a country with limited resources, where there is an imbalance between demand and supply that makes it impossible for an anaesthetist to select different ETT sizes for different age categories; Therefore, using an improper size contributes to damage to the larynx mucosa, which causes POST, again, soaking the ETT tubing in the detergents for recycling purposes can also contribute to POSTs due to the lack of ETTs3–6.
This study also showed that there was a significant association between being over 65 and the occurrence of POST, similar to a cross-sectional study of 97 participants by Jansson and colleagues17. This can be age related and can cause the oral mucosa to become thin, smooth and dry with a loss of elasticity and stippling. These changes are likely the result of changes in the epithelium and dermis, reduced proliferative activity of fibroblasts, proteoglycan synthesis and protein and collagen synthesis18. Age-related changes in the oral mucosa can lead to POST7,19–23. In contrast to this study, however, research conducted at Black Lion Hospital21 and a cross-sectional study by Fenta et al.8 found in 123 patients that age was not a significant factor for POST. This difference may be due to the existence of a protocol for selecting an appropriately sized ETT and the accessibility of using the calculated ETT size for all age categories at their study site.
This study also showed a significant association between the duration of anaesthesia longer than 2 h, 11 (7.2%) of the patients staying longer than 2 h. Develop POST. Compared with a study conducted at Watford General Hospital, this result is low at 63.9% for anaesthesia lasting more than 90 min14. In another study conducted at Black Lion Hospital, 52 (45.6%) of the study participants complained of various forms of POST, showing that 84.2% of the patients remained under anaesthesia for more than 90 minutes., in our study, these lower scores in our study may be due to only performing surgeries that do not take long, while major surgeries that take longer, such as neurosurgery, were included in the Black Lion Hospital study.
In this study, ETT size was an associated factor for POST, comparable to studies by Efrem Fenta in 123 participants and Maria Jansson in 97 participants24,25, tension fold in the tracheal mucosa causing direct trauma to the tracheal mucosa and potentially leading to POST.
Limitation of the study
In this study, the presence of a blood-stained tracheal tube on extubation, tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blockade, high tracheal tube cuff pressures, the duration of extubation, coughing during extubation, and suctioning before extubation, awake or deep extubation, timing of suctioning, suction pressure, and need for airway manoeuvres immediately following extubation and emergency surgery might bias the result hence it was not addressed in study.
Conclusion
In this study the incidence of POST was high. Geriatric age group, ETT size, and procedures lasting greater than or equal to 2 h were the independent risk factors for POST.
Recommendation
Awareness creation through training based on research finding should be made about the problem for all health professionals who will be involved in patient management after the operation. Hospital should have protocol on the way of ETT tube usage, and hospitals should provide adequate amount and different size of ETT.
We also recommend further research in this area undressing, the presence of a blood-stained tracheal tube on extubation, tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blockade, high tracheal tube cuff pressures, the duration of extubation, coughing during extubation, and suctioning before extubation, awake or deep extubation, timing of suctioning, suction pressure, and need for airway manoeuvres immediately following extubation and emergency surgery.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was secured from Ambo University institutional review board.
Consent
No individual and sensitive data and data are available on request.
Source of funding
None.
Author contribution
Z.M. and Z.B. have made substantial contributions to conception, writing—review and also contributed in editing of the manuscript drafts for scientific merit and depth.
Conflicts of interest disclosure
None.
Provenance and peer review
Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Jemal Suleiman, Kasahun Girma, Megersa Benti and Yeshitila Sintayehu for their participations.
Footnotes
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Published online 17 May 2023
Contributor Information
Zenebe Bekele, Email: zenebebekete@gmail.com.
Zewde Melese, Email: zewdemelese@gmail.com.
References
- 1. Aqil M, Khan MU, Mansoor S, et al. Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: A randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope. BMC Anesthesiol 2017;17:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lee JY, Sim WS, Kim ES, et al. Incidence and risk factors of postoperative sore throat after endotracheal intubation in Korean patients. J Int Med Res 2017;45:744–752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mathew G, Agha R. for the STROCSS Group. STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the Reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in Surgery. Int J Surg 2021;96:106165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Your R. Register research details. 2021;.
- 5. Gemechu BM, Gebremedhn EG, Melkie TB. Risk factors for postoperative throat pain after general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation at the university of Gondar teaching hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2014. Pan Afr Med J 2017;27:127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Jaensson M, Gupta A, Nilsson UG. Risk factors for development of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness after endotracheal intubation in women: a secondary analysis. AANA J 2012;80((suppl.4):S67–S73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lee SY, Shih SC, Leu YS, et al. Implications of age-related changes in anatomy for geriatric-focused difficult airways. Int J Gerontol [Internet] 2017;11:130–133. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Fenta E, Teshome D, Melaku D, et al. Incidence and factors associated with postoperative sore throat for patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation at Debre Tabor General Hospital , North central Ethiopia : a cross-sectional study. Int J Surg Open 2020;25:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Baker AB. Factors affecting the incidence of sore throat following general anesthesia with endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway. J Texas Christian Univ 2011;50:13–25. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Zuccherelli L. Postoperative upper airway problems. Southern Afr J Anesth Analg 2003;3:12–16. [Google Scholar]
- 11. McHardy FE, Chung F. Postoperative sore throat: cause, prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia 1999;54:444–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Cirilla DJ, Ngo J, Vaisman V, et al. Does the incidence of sore throat postoperatively increase with the use of a traditional intubation blade or the GlideScope? J Clin Anesth 2015;27:646–651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kalil DM, Silvestro LS, Austin PN. Novel preoperative pharmacologic methods of preventing postoperative sore throat due to tracheal intubation. AANA J 2014;82:188–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Jaensson M, Gubta A, Nilsson U. Gender differences in sore throat and hoarseness following endotracheal Tube or laryngeal mask airway. BMC Anesthesiol 2014;14:56; (4) no Canada. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ahmed A, Abbasi S, Ghafoor HB, et al. Postoperative sore throat after elective surgical procedures. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2007;19:12–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Andrea L, Baker B. Factors affecting the incidence of sore throat following general anesthesia with endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway. School Nurse Anesth 2011;14:888. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Edomwonyi NP, Ekwere IT, Omo E, et al. Postoperative throat complications after tracheal intubation. Ann Afr Med 2006;5:28–32. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chawaka HJ, Haile M. Temesgen. Predictors of postoperative sore throat among elective surgical patients at Jima University Teaching Hospital, 2015; E-mail: hunjisha@gmail.com
- 19. Higgins PP, Chung F, Mezei G. Postoperative sore throat after ambulatory surgery. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:582–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kloub R. Sore throat following tracheal intubation. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2001;16:29–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Mengistu SB, Akalu L. Magnitude and associated risk factors of post-operative sore throat following surgery by general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation in Black Lion Hospital,Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Anesth Res 2017;5:409–413. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Christensen AM, Willemoes-Larsen H, Lundby L, et al. Postoperative throat complaint after tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1994;73:786–787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Liu J, Zhang X, Gong W. Correlations between controlled endotracheal tube cuff pressure and post procedural complications. Anesth Analg 2010;111:1133–1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Biro P, Seifert B, Pasch T. Complaints of sore throat after tracheal intubation: a prospective evaluation. Eur J Anesthesiol 2005;4:307–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kadri IA, Khanzada TW, Samad A, et al. Post-thyroidectomy sore throat: a common problem. Pak J Med Sci 2009;25:408–412. [Google Scholar]