Table 3.
Comparison between the study groups regarding the coronary intervention procedure
| No spasm (n = 100) |
Radial spasm (n = 100) |
P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of punctures | 1 | 64 (64%) | 8 (8%) | 0.000 |
| 2 | 16 (16%) | 32 (32%) | 0.013 | |
| 3 | 20 (20%) | 60 (60%) | 0.000 | |
| Radial Access | Left | 92 (92%) | 28 (28%) | 0.000 |
| Right | 8 (8%) | 72 (72%) | 0.000 | |
| Size of Radial Sheath | 5 F | 84 (84%) | 16 (16%) | 0.000 |
| 6 F | 16 (16%) | 84 (84%) | 0.000 | |
| Size of Catheters | 5 F | 84 (84%) | 32 (32%) | 0.000 |
| 6 F | 16 (16%) | 68 (68%) | 0.000 | |
| Number of Catheters | 1 | 8 ( 8%) | 4 (4%) | > 0.05 |
| 2 | 44 (44%) | 52 (52%) | > 0.05 | |
| > 3 | 48 (48%) | 44 (44%) | > 0.05 | |
| Radial Tortuosity | 20 (20%) | 60 (60%) | 0.000 | |
| Procedural time | 12.4 ± 2.6 | 40.9 ± 7.6 | 0.000 |