Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 14;33(7):4949–4961. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09419-0

Table 2.

Predictive performance of different DL signatures in training and validation sets

Datasets Phase Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%) AUC (95%CI) p value
DL signature Training set AP 76.4 84.3 82.1 0.882 (0.823–0.941) 0.048*
PVP 67.3 85.0 80.0 0.822 (0.753–0.891) 0.001*
HBP 78.2 90.7 87.2 0.909 (0.860–0.958) 0.115
mp-MR 76.4 93.6 88.7 0.929 (0.829–0.966) Ref
Validation set AP 73.9 79.1 77.8 0.826 (0.755–0.897) 0.019*
PVP 73.9 86.6 83.3 0.854 (0.780–0.928) 0.259
HBP 78.3 77.6 77.8 0.888 (0.833–0.943) 0.743
mp-MR 78.3 89.6 86.7 0.894 (0.811–0.977) Ref

AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; AP, arterial phase; DL, deep learning; PVP, portal venous phase; HBP, hepatobiliary phase; mp-MR, multiple sequences magnetic resonance. p* < 0.05 indicates a significant difference