Table 2.
Six-month data of the study patients
Type of surgical technique | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAGB | Long BPL RYGB | P | |||
Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | 36.39 ± 6.85 | 26–51.6 | 38.04 ± 5.88 | 26–48.7 | 0.313a |
EBWL (kg) | 35.47 ± 13.74 | 15–75 | 31.6 ± 8.02 | 18–63 | 0.180a |
EBWL% | 54.72 ± 18.14 | 23.3–94.60 | 49.64 ± 15.31 | 26.1–90.6 | 0.238a |
Count | % | Count | % | ||
Comorbidities remission | |||||
Type II diabetes mellitus | |||||
Significant improvement | 5 | 38.5% | 6 | 27.3% | 0.708b |
Complete resolution | 8 | 61.5% | 16 | 72.7% | |
Hypertension | |||||
Significant improvement | 4 | 36.4% | 4 | 44.4% | 0.999b |
Complete resolution | 7 | 63.6% | 5 | 55.6% | |
OSA: STOP-Bang score | |||||
Low | 30 | 96.8% | 31 | 100.0% | 0.999b |
Intermediate | 1 | 3.2% | 0 | 0.0% | |
High risk | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |
Joint pain | |||||
Significant improvement | 7 | 100.0% | 10 | 90.9% | 0.999b |
Complete resolution | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 9.1% | |
Back pain | |||||
Significant improvement | 6 | 75.0% | 5 | 83.3% | 0.999b |
Complete resolution | 2 | 25.0% | 1 | 16.7% |
a: t and t value of the Student’s t test; b: χ2, Chi-square test