Skip to main content
. 2023 May 5;60(8):1063–1074. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02086-z

Table 2.

Comparison of pRNFL average thickness between groups (x¯±S)

Parameters Control (eyes = 70) NDR (eyes = 96) p value
TS 141.47 ± 10.00 140.28 ± 7.84 0.535
T 83.51 ± 7.04 82.59 ± 7.61 0.401
TI 155.30 ± 11.37 141.05 ± 11.56 0.000
NS 120.47 ± 11.86 112.59 ± 13.65 0.019
N 74.41 ± 7.21 68.99 ± 12.75 0.061
NI 115.96 ± 15.29 105.22 ± 13.85 0.008

Bold p value indicates a statistically significant difference. The statistical results in the table corrected for the variable of age

pRNFL peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, NDR patients with diabetes without clinically detectable retinopathy, TS Superotemporal, T Temporal, TI Inferotemporal, NS Superonasal, N Nasal, NI Inferonasal