Table 2.
Comparison of pRNFL average thickness between groups ()
Parameters | Control (eyes = 70) | NDR (eyes = 96) | p value |
---|---|---|---|
TS | 141.47 ± 10.00 | 140.28 ± 7.84 | 0.535 |
T | 83.51 ± 7.04 | 82.59 ± 7.61 | 0.401 |
TI | 155.30 ± 11.37 | 141.05 ± 11.56 | 0.000 |
NS | 120.47 ± 11.86 | 112.59 ± 13.65 | 0.019 |
N | 74.41 ± 7.21 | 68.99 ± 12.75 | 0.061 |
NI | 115.96 ± 15.29 | 105.22 ± 13.85 | 0.008 |
Bold p value indicates a statistically significant difference. The statistical results in the table corrected for the variable of age
pRNFL peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, NDR patients with diabetes without clinically detectable retinopathy, TS Superotemporal, T Temporal, TI Inferotemporal, NS Superonasal, N Nasal, NI Inferonasal