Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 2;7(6):445–452. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12930

Table 2.

Comparison of characteristics or computed tomography (CT) findings between patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and controls

Characteristic or CT finding Comparison between PDAC and Controls Multivariate analysis
At diagnosis Past examination 6–36 M 36–60 M
6–36 M 36–60 M
PDAC, (n = 54) Control, (n = 90) P value PDAC, (n = 39) Control, (n = 82) P value PDAC, (n = 26) Control, (n = 90) P‐value P‐value P‐value
Female, n (%) 27 (50) 43 (47.8) 0.864 22 (56.4) 35 (42.7) 0.177 11 (42.3) 43 (47.8) 0.661 0.212 0.547
Age, years median (range) 76 (57–89) 76.5 (63–90) 0.612 75 (56–87) 75.5 (62–89) 0.902 72 (53–85) 72 (56–86) 0.713 0.557 0.329
Mass, n (%) 47 (87.0) 0 (0) <0.0001 3 (7.7) 0 (0) 0.032 0 (0) 0 (0) NA 0.067 NA
MPD dilatation without cutoff, n (%) 4 (4.7) 4 (4.4) 0.473 2 (5.1) 3 (3.7) 0.657 2 (7.7) 4 (4.4) 0.615 0.496 0.669
MPD dilatation with cutoff, n (%) 40 (74.1) 0 (0) <0.0001 11 (28.2) 0 (0) <0.0001 1 (3.8) 0 (0) 0.224 <0.0001 0.202
Cyst, n (%) 36 (66.7) 26 (28.9) <0.0001 17 (43.6) 24 (29.3) 0.151 7 (26.9) 23 (25.6) 1.000 0.673 0.756
Chronic pancreatitis with calcification, n (%) 7 (13.0) 11 (13.9) 1.000 6 (15.4) 13 (15.9) 1.000 4 (15.4) 13 (14.4) 1.000 0.241 0.582
PPA, n (%) 27 (50.0) 5 (5.6) <0.0001 9 (23.1) 4 (4.9) 0.004 4 (15.4) 5 (5.6) 0.112 0.023 0.190
FPA, n (%) 4 (7.4) 4 (4.4) 0.473 6 (15.4) 3 (3.7) 0.031 3 (11.5) 4 (4.4) 0.186
UPA, n (%) 24 (44.4) 1 (1.1) <0.0001 3 (7.7) 1 (1.2) 0.037 1 (3.8) 1 (1.1) 0.400
DPA, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) NA 3 (7.7) 0 (0) 0.032 2 (7.7) 0 (0) 0.049 0.003 0.009

DPA, diffuse parenchymal atrophy; FPA, focal parenchymal atrophy; M, months; MPD, main pancreatic duct; NA, not available; PPA, partial parenchymal atrophy; UPA, upstream parenchymal atrophy.